share_log

A Great Week That Adds to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SYBT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 56% Must Be Happy

A Great Week That Adds to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SYBT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 56% Must Be Happy

一周来股票码头银行股份有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:SYBT)的一年回报率添增,持有该公司56%股份的机构投资者一定很高兴。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 07:57

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Stock Yards Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 20 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着Stock Yards Bancorp的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前 20 名股东拥有公司 51% 的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

If you want to know who really controls Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:SYBT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:SYBT),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有56%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$63m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 3.6%.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了6300万美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。上周的涨势将进一步提振一年期股东回报率,目前为3.6%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Stock Yards Bancorp.

在下图中,我们放大了Stock Yards Bancorp的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SYBT Ownership Breakdown June 13th 2024
NASDAQGS: SYBT 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stock Yards Bancorp?

关于Stock Yards Bancorp,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Stock Yards Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stock Yards Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,Stock Yards Bancorp确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Stock Yards Bancorp的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SYBT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
NASDAQGS: SYBT 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 13 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stock Yards Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.7% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.0% of common stock, and Darrell Wells holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Stock Yards Bancorp进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份占6.7%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股东,拥有6.0%的普通股,达雷尔·威尔斯持有该公司约5.0%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前20名公司拥有该公司的总所有权为51%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Stock Yards Bancorp

Stock Yards Bancorp 的内部人

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$112m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.的股份。内部人士持有价值1.12亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in Stock Yards Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Stock Yards Bancorp36%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stock Yards Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Stock Yards Bancorp,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发