share_log

Here's Why ICON (NASDAQ:ICLR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why ICON (NASDAQ:ICLR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

以下是为什么ICON(纳斯达克:ICLR)可以负责任地管理其债务
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 14:40

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过,“波动性远非风险的代名词”。评估一家公司风险时,我们一般会关注它使用的债务,因为负债过重可能导致破产。与许多其他公司一样,ICON Public Limited Company(纳斯达克:ICLR)也在使用债务。但这个债务是否会对股东构成威胁呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债务,那么它就处在债权人的控制之下。资本主义的必要环节是“创造性破坏”,即债权人无情地清算债务违约的企业。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦的)情况是,企业不得不以低价发行新股份,从而永久性地稀释股东权益。当然,债务的好处在于它往往代表了廉价的资本,尤其是在替换具有高回报率的再投资能力的公司的稀释时。考虑一家公司的债务水平时,第一步是考虑其现金和债务的总和。

What Is ICON's Debt?

ICON的债务是多少?

As you can see below, ICON had US$3.50b of debt at March 2024, down from US$4.49b a year prior. However, it does have US$400.9m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$3.10b.

如下所示,截至2024年3月,ICON的债务总额为35亿美元,低于一年前的44.9亿美元。然而,它有4.009亿美元的现金可抵消这笔债务,因此净债务约为31亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:ICLR Debt to Equity History June 13th 2024
纳斯达克GS:ICLR债务与股东权益历史 2024年6月13日

A Look At ICON's Liabilities

ICON的负债情况

The latest balance sheet data shows that ICON had liabilities of US$2.95b due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.67b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$400.9m in cash and US$3.00b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.21b.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,ICON一年内到期的负债为29.5亿美元,28.4亿美元的负债到期后到期。然而,它拥有4.009亿美元的现金和3亿美元的应收账款,这些应收账款在12个月内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(近期)应收账款的总和约为42.1亿美元。

Given ICON has a humongous market capitalization of US$26.2b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考虑到ICON的巨大市值为262亿美元,很难相信这些负债对其构成了太大的威胁。话虽如此,显然我们应该继续监测它的资产负债表,以防不测。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我们使用两个主要比率来分析债务与收益之间的关系。第一个比率是净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比率,第二个比率是其利润前利润和税(EBIT)覆盖利息支出的次数(或其利息覆盖比率)。这种方法的优点在于我们考虑到了债务的绝对数量(通过净债务与EBITDA的比率),以及与这些债务相关的实际利息支出(通过其利息覆盖比率)。

ICON has net debt worth 1.8 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 3.5 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. If ICON can keep growing EBIT at last year's rate of 20% over the last year, then it will find its debt load easier to manage. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ICON can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

ICON的净债务价值为1.8倍EBITDA,这并不算太多,但它的利息覆盖率似乎有点偏低,EBIT仅为利息费用的3.5倍。虽然这些数字并不令我们担忧,但值得注意的是,公司的债务成本正在产生实际影响。如果ICON能保持去年20%的EBIT增长率,那么它将更容易管理其债务负担。分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显然的起点。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定ICON能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。所以,如果您想看看专业人士的看法,您可能会觉得这份关于分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, ICON generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 91% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最后,一家企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能满足这一点。因此,我们总是会检查EBIT的多少被转换为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,ICON产生了非常强大的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的91%,超出了我们的预期。如果需要的话,这将使其更好地偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

ICON's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But truth be told we feel its interest cover does undermine this impression a bit. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like ICON is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. Above most other metrics, we think its important to track how fast earnings per share is growing, if at all. If you've also come to that realization, you're in luck, because today you can view this interactive graph of ICON's earnings per share history for free.

ICON的EBIT转自由现金流表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo对付14岁以下的守门员一样轻松处理债务。但说实话,我们觉得它的利息覆盖率有点削弱了这个印象。考虑到上述一系列因素,我们认为ICON在使用债务方面比较明智。尽管这带来了一些风险,但也可以为股东带来更大的回报。在许多其他指标之上,我们认为跟踪每股收益增长的速度特别重要,如果有的话。如果您也已经认识到这一点,那么您很幸运,因为今天您可以免费查看ICON的每股收益历史的交互式图表了。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

总的来说,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包含这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长的记录)。这是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发