share_log

The Recent 3.7% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Chi-Yun Wong's Week, Vtech Holdings Limited's (HKG:303) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 3.7% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Chi-Yun Wong's Week, Vtech Holdings Limited's (HKG:303) Most Bullish Insider

最近3.7%的增长一定让伟易达控股有限公司(HKG:303)最看好的内部人士CEO黄志恩的这一周变得更加光明。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 20:09

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Vtech Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Institutions own 26% of Vtech Holdings
  • 持有伟易达的内部人员似乎对公司的增长有着明显的利益,这可以从其庞大的持股中看出
  • 共有6名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有50%的所有权。
  • 机构持有伟易达的股份达26%

If you want to know who really controls Vtech Holdings Limited (HKG:303), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着伟易达控股有限公司(HKG:303),那么你就必须看看其股份登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,个人内部人员拥有公司的绝大部分份额——37%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获得最大利益(或者在经济下行时损失最多)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.7% gain.

因此,内部人员是上周3.7%涨幅中最大的受益者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Vtech Holdings.

在下图中,我们放大了伟易达控股的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:303 Ownership Breakdown June 15th 2024
SEHK:303 2024年6月15日股权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vtech Holdings?

伟易达控股的机构持股情况能告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Vtech Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Vtech Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,伟易达控股确实拥有一些机构投资者;它们持有公司股份的很大一部分。这表明某些专业投资者对其有信心。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构投资者有时也会做出错误的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,公司股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得关注伟易达控股过去的收益轨迹(如下图所示)。当然,还有其他要考虑的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:303 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 15th 2024
SEHK:303 2024年6月15日营收和增长情况

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Vtech Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chi-Yun Wong with 36% of shares outstanding. Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 4.8% of common stock, and Newcourt Trustees Limited holds about 2.8% of the company stock.

对冲基金没有太多伟易达股份。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是首席执行官黄志远,持有公司36%的流通股;哥伦比亚管理投资顾问公司是第二大股东,持有普通股的4.8%;Newcourt Trustees Limited持有公司股份的约2.8%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的研究,并发现前六大股东持有约50%的股份登记簿,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在某种程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。

Insider Ownership Of Vtech Holdings

伟易达控股的内部人员持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Vtech Holdings Limited. Insiders own HK$5.3b worth of shares in the HK$14b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人员拥有伟易达控股有限公司合计价值为53亿港元的股份。这相当有意义。可以在此处查看这些内部人员最近是否进行了买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Vtech Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众,通常是个体投资者,持有伟易达控股的35%股份。虽然这个群体不能掌控公司,但它确实可以对公司的经营产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Vtech Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning...

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很值得的,但有其他更重要的因素需要考虑。请注意,我们的投资分析显示,伟易达控股存在2个警示信号,其中1个有点令人担忧...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发