share_log

Ardmore Shipping Corporation's (NYSE:ASC) Institutional Investors Lost 5.8% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Ardmore Shipping Corporation's (NYSE:ASC) Institutional Investors Lost 5.8% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Ardmore Shipping 公司 (纽交所: ASC) 机构投资者上周亏损了 5.8%,但从长期收益获得了利益。
Simply Wall St ·  06/15 08:50

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ardmore Shipping's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考虑到机构持有大量股票,Ardmore Shipping的股价在他们的交易决策下可能容易受到冲击。
  • 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE:ASC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 67% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

为了了解谁真正掌控Ardmore Shipping Corporation(NYSE:ASC),理解业务的所有权结构至关重要。而持有最大股份的是拥有67%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或下跌)该机构将获得最多的利益(或承担最大的损失)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 5.8% last week. Still, the 73% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

没有股东会喜欢在投资上亏损,特别是机构投资者上周看到其持有价值下降了5.8%,更是不能忍受。尽管如此,过去一年73%的收益或有助于缓解其总体损失。但他们应该警惕未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ardmore Shipping.

在下图中,我们可以看到不同的Ardmore Shipping所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ASC Ownership Breakdown June 15th 2024
NYSE:ASC所有权分布2024年6月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ardmore Shipping?

机构投资者对Ardmore Shipping的持股量告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ardmore Shipping. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ardmore Shipping's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者持有Ardmore Shipping的相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者之间的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会做错误的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有某支股票时,总会存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险中。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相大量抛售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以查看Ardmore Shipping下面的历史收益和营收,但请记住还有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ASC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 15th 2024
NYSE:ASC收益和营收增长2024年6月15日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Ardmore Shipping is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, with ownership of 6.6%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 5.5% of the stock.

机构投资者持有该公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能能够强烈影响董事会决策。Ardmore Shipping不是由对冲基金拥有的。该公司最大的股东是Dimensional Fund Advisors LP,其拥有6.6%的所有权。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有的股票大约为6.0%和5.5%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Ardmore Shipping

Ardmore Shipping的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ardmore Shipping Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$42m worth of the US$897m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部人员拥有Ardmore Shipping Corporation的股票。作为个人,内部人员共同拥有价值4200万美元的价值8.97亿美元的公司股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但值得检查的是这些内部人员是否一直在抛售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ardmore Shipping. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有18%所有权的普通公众,其中大部分是个人投资者,对Ardmore Shipping有一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能还不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据表明,私营企业持有该公司10%的股份。私营企业可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过私营企业的持股而不是以个人身份拥有对公共公司的利益。虽然很难获得任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是需要进一步研究。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Ardmore Shipping you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

我觉得看看公司的真正所有者是非常有趣的。但为了获得真正的洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如我们已经发现了Ardmore Shipping的2个警示信号,您应该注意一下,其中1个有些令人担忧。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发