share_log

Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Jun Zhai Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 4.9% Last Week

Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Jun Zhai Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 4.9% Last Week

万集科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300552)的CEO翟军是最乐观的内部人士,他们上周的持股增加了4.9%
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 20:02

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Vanjee Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 万集科技重要内部控制意味着对公司增长有着特殊利益
  • 前4个股东拥有公司的51%股权。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300552), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

为了了解万集科技股份有限公司 (SZSE:300552) 的实际控制人是谁,理解企业所有权结构是非常重要的。我们可以看到,个人内部人持有公司的大部分股权,拥有51%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者出现下滑),这一团队将获得最多的好处(或者遭受最严重的损失)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥8.3b market cap following a 4.9% gain in the stock.

因此,股票价格上涨4.9%后,内部人上周得分最高。公司达到了83亿人民币的市值。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vanjee Technology.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东对万集科技有何影响。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300552 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SZSE:300552股权结构拆分于2024年6月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vanjee Technology?

机构对万集科技的占股比例非常小。这表明公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前并不是专业投资者特别青睐的对象。如果公司收益增长,可能表明这种情况刚开始引起深袋投资者们的注意。如果有多个机构投资者同时试图购买一只股票,股票价格上涨也并不罕见。因此,请考虑下面的历史收益轨迹,但请记住,最重要的是未来。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Vanjee Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

SZSE:300552的营收与收入增长于2024年6月17日。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300552 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
对于万集科技股份有限公司,对冲基金没有很多的股份。该公司的CEO翟军是最大的股东,持有43%的流通股。薛俊翠是第二大股东,拥有5.0%的普通股,而林彦田持有约1.8%的公司股份。有趣的是,第三大股东林彦田也是公司董事会成员,再次表明公司的主要股东强烈持有内部人权益。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Vanjee Technology. The company's CEO Jun Zhai is the largest shareholder with 43% of shares outstanding. Xue Jun Cui is the second largest shareholder owning 5.0% of common stock, and Lin Yan Tian holds about 1.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Lin Yan Tian is also a Member of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

万集科技股份有限公司的内部人持股比例很高。这意味着他们可以集体作出公司决策。内部人在这83亿人民币公司中拥有42亿人民币价值的股份。这是非常惊人的!可以在这里检查这些内部人是否已经出售他们的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实:大约51%的公司由前4个股东控制,这表明这些所有者在业务上拥有重大影响力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。

Insider Ownership Of Vanjee Technology

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有万集科技股份有限公司的47%的股份。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以扭转政策决策,但他们仍然可以对企业政策产生集体影响。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Insiders own CN¥4.2b worth of shares in the CN¥8.3b company. That's extraordinary! It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,投资风险的不断出现。我们已经确定了万集科技股份有限公司的一个警示信号,理解它们应该成为您投资过程的一部分。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Vanjee Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Vanjee Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发