share_log

Getting In Cheap On Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (NYSE:FIX) Might Be Difficult

Getting In Cheap On Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (NYSE:FIX) Might Be Difficult

想以低价买入Comfort Systems USA,Inc.(纽交所:FIX)很困难
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 08:40

Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s (NYSE:FIX) price-to-earnings (or "P/E") ratio of 30.8x might make it look like a strong sell right now compared to the market in the United States, where around half of the companies have P/E ratios below 16x and even P/E's below 9x are quite common.  Nonetheless, we'd need to dig a little deeper to determine if there is a rational basis for the highly elevated P/E.  

Comfort Systems USA, Inc.(NYSE: FIX)的市盈率为30.8倍,与美国市场上约一半的公司的市盈率低于16倍,甚至低于9倍的市盈率相比,现在可能看起来是一个强烈的卖出信号。然而,我们需要深入挖掘一下,以确定高市盈率是否有合理的基础。

Recent times have been pleasing for Comfort Systems USA as its earnings have risen in spite of the market's earnings going into reverse.   The P/E is probably high because investors think the company will continue to navigate the broader market headwinds better than most.  If not, then existing shareholders might be a little nervous about the viability of the share price.    

最近的时期对Comfort Systems USA来说是令人欣慰的,因为尽管整个市场的收益率出现了逆转,但公司的收益率却在上升。市盈率可能很高,因为投资者认为该公司将继续比大多数公司更好地应对广泛的市场阻力。如果不是这样的话,那么现有的股东可能会对股价的可行性有点紧张。

NYSE:FIX Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry June 16th 2024

NYSE: FIX市盈率与行业板块2024年6月16日对比

If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free report on Comfort Systems USA.

如果您想了解分析师对Comfort Systems USA的未来预测,请查看我们关于该公司的免费报告。

Does Growth Match The High P/E?  

成长与高市盈率是否匹配?

Comfort Systems USA's P/E ratio would be typical for a company that's expected to deliver very strong growth, and importantly, perform much better than the market.  

Comfort Systems USA的市盈率对于一家预计能够实现非常强劲增长的公司来说是典型的,而且重要的是,它的表现要比市场好得多。

If we review the last year of earnings growth, the company posted a terrific increase of 68%.   The latest three year period has also seen an excellent 133% overall rise in EPS, aided by its short-term performance.  Accordingly, shareholders would have probably welcomed those medium-term rates of earnings growth.  

如果我们回顾去年的收益增长,该公司的收益呈惊人的增长趋势,达到了68%。最近的三年中,每股收益也见证了133%的整体增长,受短期表现的帮助。相应地,股东可能会欣赏那些中期的盈利增长率。

Shifting to the future, estimates from the four analysts covering the company suggest earnings should grow by 13% per annum over the next three years.  That's shaping up to be materially higher than the 9.9% per annum growth forecast for the broader market.

转向未来,涵盖该公司的四位分析师预测收益将在未来三年内每年增长13%。这个增长预测明显高于更广泛市场的每年9.9%的增长预测。

In light of this, it's understandable that Comfort Systems USA's P/E sits above the majority of other companies.  Apparently shareholders aren't keen to offload something that is potentially eyeing a more prosperous future.  

鉴于此,Comfort Systems USA的市盈率高于大多数其他公司是可以理解的。显然,股东不愿意卸载那些可能在寻找更加繁荣的未来的公司。

The Final Word

最终结论

While the price-to-earnings ratio shouldn't be the defining factor in whether you buy a stock or not, it's quite a capable barometer of earnings expectations.

虽然市盈率不应是您是否购买股票的决定性因素,但它是企业盈利预期的比较良好的指标。

We've established that Comfort Systems USA maintains its high P/E on the strength of its forecast growth being higher than the wider market, as expected.  Right now shareholders are comfortable with the P/E as they are quite confident future earnings aren't under threat.  It's hard to see the share price falling strongly in the near future under these circumstances.    

我们已经分析出Comfort Systems USA在预测增长优于更广泛市场的强大增长势头的基础上保持其高市盈率。现在,股东对市盈率感到舒适,因为他们非常有信心未来收益不会受到威胁。在这些情况下,很难看到股价会大幅下降。

We don't want to rain on the parade too much, but we did also find 1 warning sign for Comfort Systems USA that you need to be mindful of.  

我们不想太多地扫兴,但我们确实发现了Comfort Systems USA的1个警告信号,您需要注意一下。

Of course, you might also be able to find a better stock than Comfort Systems USA. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have reasonable P/E ratios and have grown earnings strongly.

当然,您可能还能找到比Comfort Systems USA更好的股票。因此,您可能希望查看其他市盈率合理且盈利强劲的公司的这个免费收藏。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发