share_log

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.1b Market Cap Decline

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.1b Market Cap Decline

上海农商银行股份有限公司(SHSE:601825)的市值上周下跌21亿元人民币,私营企业遭受打击。
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 21:05

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • 17% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank is held by Institutions
  • 私营公司对上海农村商业银行的重大控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前8名股东拥有公司54%的股份
  • 上海农村商业银行17%的股份由机构持有

A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 35% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看上海农村商业银行股份有限公司(SHSE: 601825)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为35%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥2.1b.

结果,在市值下降21亿元人民币之后,私营公司整体上周遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank.

在下图中,我们放大了上海农村商业银行的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601825 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SHSE: 601825 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank?

关于上海农村商业银行,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,上海农村商业银行确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看上海农村商业银行的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601825 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
SHSE: 601825 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 17 日

Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Shanghai International Group Co.,Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. and China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.3%.

上海农村商业银行不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,上海国际集团有限公司, Ltd. 是最大股东,已发行股份的9.3%。第二和第三大股东是宝山钢铁股份有限公司和中国中远海运有限公司,持有同等数量的股份,为8.3%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前8名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank

上海农村商业银行的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own CN¥30m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义拥有上海农村商业银行股份有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能会通过我们尚未采用的公司结构获得间接利益。由于规模如此之大,我们预计内部人士不会拥有很大一部分股票。他们共拥有3000万元人民币的股票。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

上海农村商业银行拥有32%的所有权,主要是个人投资者,对上海农村商业银行有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 35%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有35%的已发行股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 8.3% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前拥有上海农村商业银行8.3%的股份。很难肯定地说,但这表明它们将商业利益交织在一起。这可能是一个战略利害关系,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变动。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了一个你应该知道的上海农村商业银行的警告标志。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发