share_log

Chief Scientific Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IBRX) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 4.5% After Recent Drop

Chief Scientific Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IBRX) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 4.5% After Recent Drop

最大股东、免疫生物公司(NASDAQ: IBRX)首席科学官Patrick Soon-Shiong在最近的股价下跌后,其持股的价值下降了4.5%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 08:11

Key Insights

主要见解

  • ImmunityBio's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in ImmunityBio is 10%
  • ImmunityBio的大量内部股权表明公司扩张具有内在的利益。
  • 前两大股东持有该公司62%的股份。
  • 机构在ImmunityBio中的持有比例为10%。

A look at the shareholders of ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

观察ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) 的股东,可以告诉我们哪个组织最具有影响力。我们可以看到,个人内部股东持有公司43%的股权。换句话说,该组织面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$194m.

因此,由于市值下降了1.94亿美元,内部人员作为一个组织遭受了最高的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ImmunityBio.

让我们更加深入地了解股东的不同类型,看看它们对ImmunityBio有什么启示。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:IBRX Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
NasdaqGS:IBRX所有权分解 2024年6月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ImmunityBio?

机构投资者对ImmunityBio有相当数量的股份。这表明在专业投资者之间有一定的可信度。但是,我们不能仅凭这个事实来依赖机构的投资,因为机构有时会做坏投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,存在股票过度交易的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面看到ImmunityBio的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更复杂的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ImmunityBio. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ImmunityBio's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

NasdaqGS:IBRX收入和营收增长2024年6月17日。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:IBRX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
ImmunityBio未被对冲基金持有。因为行动比言语更有说服力,所以当内部人员在一家公司中拥有大量股份时,我们认为这是一个好的迹象。在ImmunityBio的情况下,其首席科学官Patrick Soon-Shiong是最大的股东,持有公司42%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有20%和14%的流通股份。

ImmunityBio is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In ImmunityBio's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Patrick Soon-Shiong, is the largest shareholder, holding 42% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 20% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

最新的数据表明,内部人员拥有ImmunityBio, Inc.的合理比例。可以看到,内部人员在这家41亿美元的公司中持有有意义的18亿美元的股份。大多数人会认为,尤其是在这样一个公司中,这显示了与股东的良好协调。您可以单击这里查看内部人员是否一直在购买或出售。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到相同的效果,但是该股票的分析师覆盖率很低。因此,还有很大的空间进行更多的覆盖。

Insider Ownership Of ImmunityBio

普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有ImmunityBio的13%股份。尽管拥有这样的所有权,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,这种所有权可能不足以改变公司的政策。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ImmunityBio, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.8b stake in this US$4.1b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

在所有者的身份方面,我们的最新数据表明,内部人员拥有ImmunityBio, Inc.的合理比例。看到内部人员在这家价值41亿美元的公司中持有有意义的18亿美元的股份非常有趣。在这个公司中,股东们是基本上相同的。其中有些人做了更好的工作,赚了钱,但有些人输了,必须面对低回报。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in ImmunityBio. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

与公司的政策相关的所有权可能不足以改变决策的方向。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 20%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司占20%的所有权,将在塑造以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。一些人可能会喜欢这一点,因为私募股权有时是行动派,对管理层负责。但是,有时,私募股权只是在公司公开上市后出售。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据表明,私有公司持有该公司14%的股份。单凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得研究谁拥有这些私有公司。有时候,内部人员或其他相关方可以通过单独的私人公司拥有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - ImmunityBio has 6 warning signs (and 5 which are potentially serious) we think you should know about.

我非常有兴趣看公司具体的所有者是谁。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - ImmunityBio有6个警示信号(5个可能严重)我们认为您应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发