share_log

RPC (NYSE:RES) Shareholders Have Lost 15% Over 1 Year, Earnings Decline Likely the Culprit

RPC (NYSE:RES) Shareholders Have Lost 15% Over 1 Year, Earnings Decline Likely the Culprit

RPC(纽交所:RES)的股东在1年内亏损了15%,盈利下降很可能是罪魁祸首。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 08:41

It's easy to match the overall market return by buying an index fund. While individual stocks can be big winners, plenty more fail to generate satisfactory returns. Unfortunately the RPC, Inc. (NYSE:RES) share price slid 17% over twelve months. That's well below the market return of 23%. Longer term investors have fared much better, since the share price is up 6.7% in three years. It's down 21% in about a quarter.

通过购买指数基金很容易达到全市场回报。虽然个别股票可能大赚,但更多的股票未能取得令人满意的回报。不幸的是,RPC公司(NYSE:RES)股价在过去的十二个月中下跌了17%。这远低于市场回报的23%。而长期投资者表现得更好,因为股价在三年内上涨了6.7%。在大约一个季度的时间里下跌了21%。

If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for RPC isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.

如果过去一周是任何事情的指示,RPC的投资者情绪并不乐观,因此让我们看看基本面和股价之间是否存在不匹配。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

虽然一些人仍然相信有效市场假说,但已经证明市场是过度反应的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。一个不完美但简单的方法来考虑公司市场看法的变化是比较每股收益(EPS)的变化和股价的波动。

Unfortunately RPC reported an EPS drop of 45% for the last year. The share price fall of 17% isn't as bad as the reduction in earnings per share. So despite the weak per-share profits, some investors are probably relieved the situation wasn't more difficult.

不幸的是,RPC上一年的每股收益下降了45%。尽管每股收益利润较弱,但一些投资者可能松了一口气,因为情况没有更加困难。与每股收益的降低相比,股价下跌了17%并不算太糟糕。

The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下图显示了EPS随时间的变化情况(如果您单击该图像,则可以查看更多详细信息)。

earnings-per-share-growth
NYSE:RES Earnings Per Share Growth June 17th 2024
NYSE:RES每股收益增长2024年6月17日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..

很高兴地报告,该公司的CEO获得的报酬比同等资本化公司的大多数CEO要适度。关注CEO的薪酬值得一提,但更重要的问题是公司是否将在今后的岁月中不断增长收益。在买卖股票之前,我们总是建议仔细研究历史增长趋势,在此处提供。

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

While the broader market gained around 23% in the last year, RPC shareholders lost 15% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 2% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand RPC better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for RPC you should be aware of.

尽管包括分红在内的最好的股票有时会在十二个月的周期内低于市场平均水平,但整个市场在去年的收益率约为23%,但RPC的股东却亏损了15%。然而,要记住,即使是最好的股票有时也会在十二个月的周期内低于市场平均水平。不幸的是,去年的表现可能表明存在未解决的挑战,因为它比过去五年的年化损失2%还要差。我们意识到,巴伦·罗斯柴尔德曾说过,投资者应该“在街道上有鲜血时买入”,但我们警告投资者首先要确信他们在购买高质量的业务。跟踪长期的股价表现总是很有趣的。但是要更好地了解RPC,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。因此,我们发现RPC有2个预警,您需要注意。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果您愿意查看另一家公司-具有潜在更优质财务状况的公司-则不要错过这个免费的公司列表,这些公司已经证明他们可以增长收益。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发