share_log

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

以下是为什么Moog(纽交所:MOG.A)能够负责地管理其债务
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 09:23

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Moog Inc. (NYSE:MOG.A) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

David Iben称:“波动性不是我们关注的风险。我们关心的是避免永久性资本损失。” 因此,当您考虑一个给定股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能使一家公司陷入困境。重要的是,Moog Inc.(NYSE:MOG.A)确实存在债务。但真正的问题是,这笔债务是否会使公司陷入风险。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

债务资助企业,直到企业无法通过新的资本或自由现金流偿还债务为止。在最坏的情况下,如果一个公司不能偿还其债权人,它会破产。然而,常见的(但依然令人痛苦的)情况是,公司需要以低价筹集新的股本资本,从而永久性地稀释股东的股权。当然,很多公司使用债务来融资增长,而没有任何负面影响。考虑一个公司的负债水平的第一步是考虑公司的现金和负债合起来。

How Much Debt Does Moog Carry?

Moog的负债有多大?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Moog had US$948.6m in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$59.1m in cash leading to net debt of about US$889.5m.

下面的图表(点击可放大)显示,Moog在2024年3月有948.6亿美元的债务;与前一年大致相同。另一方面,它拥有总计59.1亿美元的现金,因此净债务约为889.5亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MOG.A Debt to Equity History June 17th 2024
NYSE:MOG.A资产负债历史,截至2024年6月17日

How Healthy Is Moog's Balance Sheet?

Moog的资产负债表状况如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Moog had liabilities of US$1.00b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.28b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$59.1m and US$1.21b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.01b.

根据最近公布的资产负债表,Moog有100亿美元的负债到期,应在12个月内偿还,以及128亿美元的负债超过12个月到期。另一方面,它拥有59.1亿美元的现金和121亿美元的应收账款,应在一年内到期。因此,其负债超过现金和(短期)应收账款的总和101亿美元。

Given Moog has a market capitalization of US$5.13b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

考虑到Moog的市值为51.3亿美元,很难相信这些负债会对其构成威胁。但负债足够大,我们肯定建议股东继续关注资产负债表情况。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过查看净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA)并计算其利息费用(利息覆盖)来相对衡量公司的负债水平。这样,我们考虑债务的绝对规模以及支付的利息费用。

Moog has net debt worth 1.9 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 5.2 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Importantly, Moog grew its EBIT by 31% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Moog can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Moog的净债务为EBITDA的1.9倍,这不算太多,但其利息覆盖率看起来有点低,EBIT仅为利息费用的5.2倍。虽然这些数字并不让我们担忧,但值得注意的是,公司的财务费用确实产生了实质性影响。重要的是,Moog在过去12个月内将EBIT增长了31%,这种增长将使其更容易处理其债务。分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要关注的领域。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定Moog能否随着时间推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现有关分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Moog created free cash flow amounting to 11% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.

最后,尽管税务局可能热爱会计利润,但借款人只接受真实的现金。因此,我们始终检查多少EBIT被转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,Moog创造了相当于其EBIT的11%的自由现金流,这是一个令人失望的表现。对于我们来说,这么低的现金转化率引发了一些关于其消除债务的能力的担忧。

Our View

我们的观点

On our analysis Moog's EBIT growth rate should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to convert EBIT to free cash flow. Considering this range of data points, we think Moog is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Moog you should be aware of.

我们的分析显示,Moog的EBIT增长率应该表明它不会遇到太多的债务问题。但我们上面提到的其他因素并不那么令人鼓舞。例如,它似乎需要努力才能将EBIT转换为自由现金流。考虑到这些数据点的范围,我们认为Moog处于管理其债务水平的良好位置。话虽如此,负担是足够沉重的,我们建议任何股东都要密切关注它。在分析负债水平时,资产负债表是明显的开始地点。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表以外的风险。典型例子:我们发现Moog存在一项警告标志,您应该意识到。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发