share_log

Private Companies Who Hold 41% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) Gained 14%, Institutions Profited as Well

Private Companies Who Hold 41% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) Gained 14%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的私有化公司持股比例为41%,获利14%,机构也有获利。
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 21:05

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • 37% of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd is held by Institutions
  • 晶晨股份(上海)有限公司被私营企业所持有的相当大的股份说明它们共同在管理和业务策略方面具有更多的说法权。
  • 该公司的前五大股东拥有51%的股份。
  • 晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的37%股份由机构持有。

Every investor in Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的每个投资者都应该意识到最有力的股东群体。在该公司中持有最多股票的群体,精确到约41%的私营企业。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥26b last week, while institutions who own 37% also benefitted.

市值上周触及260亿人民币后,私营企业获得了最大的收益,持有37%的机构也受益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd.

在下面的表格中,我们放大了晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688099 Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
SHSE:688099所有权分布图(2024年6月18日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd?

机构投资者在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司中持有相当数量的股份。这表明该公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们也有时会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价下跌也是很常见的。因此,值得检查晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,还要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,机构投资者在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司中持有相当数量的股份。这表明该公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们也有时会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价下跌也是很常见的。因此,值得检查晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,还要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688099 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
SHSE:688099收益和营业收入增长情况(2024年6月18日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. Amlogic (Hong Kong) Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 6.3% of the stock.

我们注意到,对晶晨股份(上海)有限公司没有什么实质性投资的对冲基金。晶晨股份(香港)有限公司是目前最大的股东,持有29%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有的股票数量约为7.6%和6.3%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前5位股东控制了该公司超过一半的股份,这意味着该组人对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd

晶晨股份(上海)有限公司内部持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥2.5m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息表明,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司内部人员拥有不到1%的股份。但是,我们注意到,内部人员可能通过私营企业或其他企业结构间接拥有利益。这是一家相当大的公司,所以董事会成员拥有公司的实质性利益,而不占比例利益也是可能的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约250万元的股份(以当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员拥有股份是好的,但检查这些内部人员是否一直在购买也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众(包括散户投资者)拥有公司的20%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这个群体不能必然占据主导地位,但它肯定可以对公司的运营产生实际的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私营企业拥有已发行股份的41%。私营企业可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过持有私营企业的股份而非个人身份来投资公共公司。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但需要注意作为进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我非常有兴趣了解谁真正拥有一家公司。但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。请注意,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警告信号,您应该了解该信号......

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发