share_log

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

纳斯达克:MYPS市值下降5,100万美元后,持有重要股份的散户和机构都可能感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 09:35

Key Insights

主要见解

  • PLAYSTUDIOS' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders own 16% of PLAYSTUDIOS
  • PLAYSTUDIOS重要的零售投资者所有权表明,关键决策受到更大的公众股东的影响。
  • 前25大股东持有47%的业务。
  • 内部人拥有PLAYSTUDIOS 16%的股份。

If you want to know who really controls PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYPS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道真正控制PLAYSTUDIOS,Inc.(NASDAQ:MYPS)的人是谁,那么您将必须查看其股份登记簿的构成。在该公司持有最多股份的集团股东中,约占47%,是零售投资者。换句话说,该集团将从其对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)回报。

While institutions who own 36% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$268m last week,retail investors took the most losses.

虽然机构投资者持股36%在上周市值下跌至2.68亿美元后承受了压力,但零售投资者蒙受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PLAYSTUDIOS.

让我们仔细了解一下不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关PLAYSTUDIOS的什么信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:MYPS Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
纳斯达克GM:MYPS所有权结构分布2024年6月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PLAYSTUDIOS?

机构投资者对PLAYSTUDIOS告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PLAYSTUDIOS. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PLAYSTUDIOS, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在PLAYSTUDIOS中持有相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者之间有一定的信誉。但如果仅仅依赖于这个事实是不可靠的,因为机构投资者有时会像其他人一样做出错误的投资。如果有两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌也不是罕见的现象。因此,值得检查PLAYSTUDIOS以往的盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,还要考虑其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:MYPS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
纳斯达克GM:MYPS业绩和营收增长2024年6月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in PLAYSTUDIOS. With a 14% stake, CEO Andrew Pascal is the largest shareholder. With 4.9% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Icon Management Associates LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

对于PLAYSTUDIOS,对冲基金没有持有太多的股份。持股14%的CEO Andrew Pascal是最大的股东。以4.9%和3.9%的流通股份比例,BlackRock,Inc.和Icon Management Associates LLC分别是第二和第三大股东。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of PLAYSTUDIOS

PLAYSTUDIOS的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.. Insiders own US$43m worth of shares in the US$268m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明内部人拥有PLAYSTUDIOS,Inc.的合理比例。内部人在这家市值为2.68亿美元的公司中持有4300万美元的股份。我们认为这表明内部人与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相对较小;一些内部人可能创立了业务。您可以单击此处查看内部人是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括零售投资者在内的普通公众拥有该公司47%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然该集团不能决定一切,但它肯定可以对公司的经营产生实质性影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我总是喜欢检查营收增长的历史记录。您也可以通过查看这个详细的图表中历史营收和收益的免费图表来了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发