share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Upwork Inc.'s (NASDAQ:UPWK) Recent US$70m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Upwork Inc.'s (NASDAQ:UPWK) Recent US$70m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽略Upwork Inc.(纳斯达克:UPWK)近7,000万美元的市值下降,因为长期利润仍处于良好状态
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 06:29

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Upwork's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考虑到机构在股票中持有大多数股份,Upwork的股价可能会受到他们的交易决策的影响。
  • 共有17家投资者持有该公司的大部分股权,占51%的所有权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 77% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK) 的股东,可以告诉我们哪一组最强大。在持股77%的情况下,机构拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该组面临了最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.9% last week. Still, the 12% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

在投资中亏钱是没有股东喜欢的,特别是机构投资者,在上周看到他们的持股市值下降了4.9%之后更是如此。不过,12% 的一年增益可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但他们应当注意未来的进一步损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Upwork, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Upwork的每种股东,从以下图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:UPWK Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
NasdaqGS:UPWK 划分所有权 2024年6月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Upwork?

机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Upwork does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Upwork's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到Upwork确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的Upwork收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:UPWK Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
NasdaqGS:UPWK 收益和营业收入增长 2024年6月20日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Upwork. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Hayden Brown directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此可能会共同影响董事会决策。我们注意到,对于Upwork,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。目前,最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有公司12%的股份。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有公司股份的7.1%和3.9%。此外,公司的首席执行官Hayden Brown直接持有总股份的0.9%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更仔细地看一下我们的所有权数据,发现前17名股东拥有51%的股权,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Upwork

Upwork内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Upwork Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$97m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明内部人士持有Upwork Inc.的一些股份。这是一个相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意义的对齐是一件好事。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约9700万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人都会认为这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益相关性。但仍然值得检查这些内部人士是否一直在出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Upwork. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通市民,通常是个体投资者,持有Upwork的16%的股份。虽然这种所有权的大小可能不足以影响他们的政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Upwork better, we need to consider many other factors.

在考虑持股者时,总是值得考虑拥有股权的不同群体。但要更好地了解Upwork,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我总是喜欢检查营收增长的历史记录。您也可以通过查看这个详细的图表中历史营收和收益的免费图表来了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发