share_log

Investing in Packaging Corporation of America (NYSE:PKG) Five Years Ago Would Have Delivered You a 136% Gain

Investing in Packaging Corporation of America (NYSE:PKG) Five Years Ago Would Have Delivered You a 136% Gain

五年前投资美国纽交所的美国包装公司(NYSE:PKG)将为您带来136%的收益。
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 14:18

The worst result, after buying shares in a company (assuming no leverage), would be if you lose all the money you put in. But on the bright side, if you buy shares in a high quality company at the right price, you can gain well over 100%. One great example is Packaging Corporation of America (NYSE:PKG) which saw its share price drive 101% higher over five years.

购买公司股票的最坏结果(假设没有杠杆),就是你把所有的钱都亏光了。但好的一面是,如果你在正确的价格下购买高质量的公司的股票,你可以获得100%以上的收益。一个很好的例子是美国包装公司(NYSE:PKG),在5年内其股价上涨了101%。

Now it's worth having a look at the company's fundamentals too, because that will help us determine if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business.

现在值得更详细地了解该公司的基本面,因为这将帮助我们判断长期股东回报是否与基础业务的表现相匹配。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯维尔超级投资者》中,沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式。考虑市场对公司的看法如何发生变化的一个不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的变动进行比较。股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式沃伦·巴菲特曾经描述过,股价并不总是理性地反映了企业的价值。评估市场对一家公司的情绪如何变化的一个有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

Packaging Corporation of America's earnings per share are down 0.7% per year, despite strong share price performance over five years.

尽管表现优异,美国包装公司的每股收益年均下降了0.7%。

So it's hard to argue that the earnings per share are the best metric to judge the company, as it may not be optimized for profits at this point. Therefore, it's worth taking a look at other metrics to try to understand the share price movements.

因此,很难认为每股收益是判断公司的最佳指标,因为它可能在此时未被优化以获取利润。因此,值得查看其他指标以尝试了解股价的动向。

In contrast revenue growth of 4.3% per year is probably viewed as evidence that Packaging Corporation of America is growing, a real positive. In that case, the company may be sacrificing current earnings per share to drive growth.

相反,每年4.3%的收入增长可能被视为美国包装公司正在增长的证据,这是一个真正的积极因素。在这种情况下,公司可能会牺牲当前每股收益来推动增长。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

以下图像显示了公司的营业收入和盈利(随时间变化)(单击以查看准确的数字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:PKG Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
NYSE:PKG营收增长和收益增长2024年6月20日

This free interactive report on Packaging Corporation of America's balance sheet strength is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

如果你想进一步调查股票情况,可以从Packaging Corporation of America的资产负债表强度这个免费的互动报告开始。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Packaging Corporation of America the TSR over the last 5 years was 136%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考虑到任何给定股票的总股东回报率和股价回报率都是很重要的。TSR包括任何分拆或折价的融资价值和任何股息,假设股息已经再投资。因此,对于支付慷慨股息的公司,TSR通常比股价回报率高得多。我们注意到,在过去的5年中,美国包装公司的TSR为136%,比上述股价回报率高。而且,没有什么奖励比猜测股息支付更好了!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

It's nice to see that Packaging Corporation of America shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 45% over the last year. Of course, that includes the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 19%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Packaging Corporation of America better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Packaging Corporation of America you should be aware of.

很高兴看到,美国包装公司的股东在过去一年中获得了总股东回报率高达45%的收益。当然,这包括股息。这样的获利比5年的年度TSR(19%)更好。因此,最近的情况看起来是正面的。持乐观的态度看待最近TSR的改善,可以表示其业务正在不断改善。跟踪长期股价表现总是很有趣的。但要更好地了解美国包装公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。举个例子:我们已经发现了1个警告信号,提醒你要注意美国包装公司。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).

如果您喜欢与管理层一起购买股票,那么您可能会喜欢这个公司的免费列表。 (提示:其中许多公司不为人注意且具有吸引力的估值。)

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发