share_log

In the Wake of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Latest US$130m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Latest US$130m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在LYEL的最新1.3亿市值下跌之后,机构投资者可能被迫采取严厉措施。
Simply Wall St ·  06/21 06:33

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lyell Immunopharma implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构对Lyell免疫药物的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价有显著影响。
  • 前6大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

观察Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: LYEL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。我们可以看到机构占有这家公司的大部分股权,拥有52%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最多的利益(或如果经济下滑,将损失最多)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$130m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 37% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Lyell Immunopharma's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,基金可能需要卖出股票,这对个人投资者可能不理想。机构或“流动性提供者”掌控大量资金,因此这些类型的投资者通常对股票价格的变动具有很大的影响力。因此,如果Lyell免疫药物的股价继续走弱,机构投资者可能会感到被迫卖出股票,这对个人投资者可能不理想。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lyell Immunopharma, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Lyell免疫药物的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LYEL Ownership Breakdown June 21st 2024
NasdaqGS: LYEL所有权分布2024年6月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyell Immunopharma?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Lyell免疫药物的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Lyell Immunopharma does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lyell Immunopharma's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到Lyell Immunopharma确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司的很大部分股票。这表明专业投资者中有一些可信度。但我们不能仅凭这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出错误的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Lyell免疫药物下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LYEL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 21st 2024
NasdaqGS: LYEL财报和营收增长2024年6月21日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lyell Immunopharma. The company's largest shareholder is Arch Venture Partners, L.P., with ownership of 14%. GSK plc is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Mwg Management Ltd. holds about 7.9% of the company stock.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半以上的股份,因此它们可以集体行使重大的权力。我们注意到对于Lyell Immunopharma来说,对冲基金并没有意义。该公司最大的股东是Arch Venture Partners,L.P.,持有14%的股权。GSK plc是第二大股东,持有普通股的12%,Mwg Management Ltd.持有公司股份的约7.9%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以知道风向如何。就我们所知,目前并没有该公司的分析师覆盖。因此,可能被忽略了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell免疫药物的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$19m worth of the US$535m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以看到个人拥有Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.股份。就个人而言,内部人员共拥有价值1900万美元的价值美元公司股份。看到内部人员进行了一些投资是好的,但是了解一下这些内部人员是否一直在购买股票是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lyell Immunopharma. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有12%的股份,广大公众,主要包括个人投资者,对Lyell Immunopharma造成了一定影响。这种所有权的规模虽然相当大,但如果决策不与其他大股东保持同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 20% stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私人股权投资公司持有Lyell免疫药物20%的股份。这表明他们在重要的政策决策方面可能具有影响力。有时我们会看到私募股权基金长期持有,但一般来说,他们的投资时间较短,不会在公共公司中投资,而与名字相同的一样。过一段时间后,他们可能会寻求出售和重新分配资金。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Lyell Immunopharma. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们看到公共公司持有Lyell Immunopharma的12%。很难说准,但这表明它们具有相互交织的业务利益。这可能是一种战略性利益,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lyell Immunopharma better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for Lyell Immunopharma (2 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

关于拥有股份的不同群体始终值得考虑。但是要更好地了解Lyell Immunopharma,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了Lyell Immunopharma的5个警告信号(2个不应被忽视!)在此进行投资之前应该了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发