PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369) Adds CN¥442m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 65% Stake in That Gain
PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369) Adds CN¥442m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 65% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in PowerTECH's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 65% ownership
- Institutional ownership in PowerTECH is 12%
- 从其拥有的大量股份可以看出,内部人士似乎对PowerTECH的增长有着既得利益。
- 共有2位投资者持有该公司65%的所有权
- PowerTECH在机构投资者中的持有比例为12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 65% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解PowerTECH Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301369)真正的控制者,了解公司的所有权结构是很重要的。持有最大股份的集团是内部个人股东,持股比例高达65%。换句话说,该集团从其对公司的投资中获得或失去的利益最大。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.
因此,内部人士是上周14%收益最大的受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of PowerTECH, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解PowerTECH的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240622/0-c7f5a987c8cc1ef704c1b886d7643513-0-6a0b3db897574b9be691b9110f740aa2.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PowerTECH?
机构投资者持有PowerTECH的意义是什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that PowerTECH does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PowerTECH's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,PowerTECH确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司的大部分股份。这表明职业投资者中存在一些可信度。但是仅凭这一事实,我们无法依赖机构投资者,因为机构投资者有时也会做出错误的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有某只股票时,总会存在因过度交易造成的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方可能会争相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一家没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到PowerTECH的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是不止这些。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240622/0-c7f5a987c8cc1ef704c1b886d7643513-1-02c0cab184603af8576e1558995ba7b9.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in PowerTECH. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Chimei Zhang with 33% of shares outstanding. With 32% and 2.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Junling Zheng and Technology Financial Group are the second and third largest shareholders. Junling Zheng, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
对于PowerTECH,对冲基金持有的股份不多。从我们的数据可以看出,最大的股东是张志梅,持有33%的流通股。Junling Zheng和Technology Financial Group分别持有32%和2.3%的流通股。占据第二大股东地位的Junling Zheng也是首席执行官的头衔。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of PowerTECH
PowerTECH的内部人士持有更多的股份。这使得他们有效地控制了公司。考虑到其市值为3.7亿元人民币,这意味着他们持有24亿元人民币的股票。大多数人都会认为这是一个积极的因素,表明他们与股东有强烈的利益一致性。单击此处以查看这些内部人士是买入还是卖出。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of PowerTECH Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.7b, that means they have CN¥2.4b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
一般公众,主要是个人投资者,持有PowerTECH的22%股份,对PowerTECH有一定的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在政策决策中占据优势地位,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over PowerTECH. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
了解一家公司的控制者确实很有趣。但是,为了获得真正的洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定PowerTECH存在4个警告信号(其中3个值得关注),您应该知道。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for PowerTECH (3 are a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
我发现了解一家公司到底由谁拥有是非常有趣的。但是为了获得真正的信息,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定PowerTECH存在4个警告信号(其中3个值得关注),您应该知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。