share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

机构投资者在联邦农业抵押贷款公司(纽交所:AGM)拥有71%的股权,资金压力较大。
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 09:15

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Federal Agricultural Mortgage implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构在联邦农业抵押贷款公司的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价具有重要影响。
  • 总共有20位股东持有该公司的50%股权
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

为了了解谁真正控制着联邦农业抵押贷款公司(NYSE:AGM),了解该公司的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有公司的最大股份,占71%的股份。换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大的利益(或最大的损失)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.0% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 27% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

因此,机构投资者在该公司的股价上涨3.0%后获得了最丰厚的回报。股东一年的回报率目前为27%,上周的涨幅更是锦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federal Agricultural Mortgage.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对联邦农业抵押贷款公司能够提供哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AGM Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
NYSE:AGM所有权拆分2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federal Agricultural Mortgage?

机构所有权对联邦农业抵押贷款公司意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Federal Agricultural Mortgage already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Federal Agricultural Mortgage, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

联邦农业抵押贷款公司已经有机构进入股份登记册。事实上,他们拥有相当大的股份,这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出不良的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,大股价下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查联邦农业抵押贷款公司的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AGM Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
NYSE:AGM收入和营收增长情况2024年6月22日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.3% of shares outstanding. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.3% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.4% of the company stock.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的发行股,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对联邦农业抵押贷款公司而言,对冲基金并没有太多的股份。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大的股东,持有7.3%的流通股,而FMR LLC是第二大股东,占普通股的6.3%,而领先集团公关公司则持有约5.4%的公司股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更多深入调查,我们发现前20大股东在该公司中拥有的股权总共占50%,表明没有单一股东对该公司具有重大的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Federal Agricultural Mortgage

联邦农业抵押贷款公司内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$27m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部人士持有联邦农业抵押贷款公司的股份。这是一家很大的公司,所以看到一些潜在的利益相关方持有股份通常是一个积极的信号。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2700万美元的股份(以当前价格计算)。大多数人会说这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但考虑到这些内部人士是否一直在抛售股份也是值得检查的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常,个人投资者作为一般公众持有联邦农业抵押贷款公司的28%股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们的有利条件下影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Federal Agricultural Mortgage , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体很值得,但其它更重要的因素还有要考虑。例如,投资风险这个永恒的降临者。我们已经识别出一种警示标志,联邦农业抵押贷款公司需要认真研究并纳入您的投资流程中。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发