share_log

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SWBI) US$77m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 9.5% Returns

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SWBI) US$77m Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 9.5% Returns

一年中获得9.5%回报后,史密斯威森品牌公司的市值下降了7700万美元,但机构投资者可能忽略了这一点。(纳斯达克股票代码:SWBI)
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 09:48

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Smith & Wesson Brands' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 考虑到机构大量持股,Smith & Wesson Brands的股价可能会受到它们交易决策的影响。
  • 共有15名投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,拥有50%的所有权。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

If you want to know who really controls Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWBI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制着Smith & Wesson Brands,股份注册表的配置就是重点。 占公司股份最多的持有者群体,精确地说是约54%的机构。 换句话说,该组面临的最大上涨潜力(或下降风险)是最高的。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$77m last week. However, the 9.5% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上周公司市值下跌7,700万美元后,机构投资者遭受了最大的损失。然而,9.5%的一年回报率可能有助于缓解其总体损失。但他们可能对未来的损失感到警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Smith & Wesson Brands.

在下面的图表中,我们会关注 Smith & Wesson Brands 的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SWBI Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
NasdaqGS: SWBI股权结构2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Smith & Wesson Brands?

机构持股告诉我们关于Smith & Wesson Brands的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Smith & Wesson Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Smith & Wesson Brands' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,Smith & Wesson Brands确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。 这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。 然而,最好不要依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。 他们错误的时候也有。 当多个机构拥有股票时,总会存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方面都可能会竞相抛售股票。 在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。 您可以看到下面 Smith & Wesson Brands 的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SWBI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
NasdaqGS: SWBI收益和营收增长2024年6月22日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 6.0% of Smith & Wesson Brands shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 9.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有超过半数的已发行股份,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。 看起来BlackRock,Inc拥有公司9.3%的流通股最多,其次是第二和第三大股东,他们分别拥有7.9%和6.6%的流通股。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的股权拆分数据表明,前15大股东持有的股权总和为50%,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Smith & Wesson Brands

Smith & Wesson Brands的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,在管辖范围之间会有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理担任执行董事会成员并非不寻常,特别是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$747m, and insiders have US$10m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部人员拥有Smith & Wesson Brands股份。 其市值仅为7.47亿美元,内部人员拥有自己名下价值1000万美元的股票。 有人会说这表明股东和董事会的利益一致。 但最好检查这些内部人员是否一直在卖出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Smith & Wesson Brands. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

占公司股份38%的普通公众,主要包括个人投资者,可以对Smith & Wesson Brands产生一定影响。 股份这么大,虽然可观,但如果决策不与其他大股东保持一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Smith & Wesson Brands better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Smith & Wesson Brands that you should be aware of before investing here.

思考拥有公司股份的不同人群总是值得的。 但是要更好地了解Smith & Wesson Brands,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,我们为Smith & Wesson Brands发现了1个警告信号, 在这里投资之前应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发