share_log

With 73% Institutional Ownership, Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 73% Institutional Ownership, Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

凭借73%的机构持股量,卡特彼勒公司(纽交所:CAT)是大佬们最喜爱的公司之一。
Simply Wall St ·  06/23 08:22

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Caterpillar implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构对卡特彼勒的重大持股意味着他们对该公司股票价格有重要影响。
  • 这家公司的前22大股东拥有其50%的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制纽交所的卡特彼勒公司,则需要考虑其股份登记簿的组成。机构拥有73%的股份,是该公司最大的股东。换句话说,该组织在投资中将获得或失去最多的利益。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有巨额资金,他们的市场举动往往受到零售或个人投资者的严密审查。因此,机构在公司中的大量投资通常被认为是一个积极的特征。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Caterpillar.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以为我们提供关于卡特彼勒公司的什么信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CAT Ownership Breakdown June 23rd 2024
纽交所卡特彼勒公司的所有权分布情况于2024年6月23日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Caterpillar?

机构持股情况对卡特彼勒公司意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Caterpillar already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Caterpillar's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

卡特彼勒公司已经有机构投资者持股。实际上,他们持有该公司相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者中有一定程度的信誉。但是我们不能仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会做出错误的投资决策,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一家股票时,总会有一个“拥挤的交易”风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到卡特彼勒公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事往往比数据更加复杂。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CAT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 23rd 2024
纽交所卡特彼勒公司的营业收入和收益增长情况于2024年6月23日。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Caterpillar. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.8% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的投资偏好。我们注意到,对该公司持有9.8%流通股的The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股东。为了更好地理解,第二大股东持有约7.6%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.9%的流通股。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更详细的所有权数字表明,前22名股东拥有50%的股权,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有占据优势的地位。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Caterpillar

卡特彼勒公司的内部股东持股情况。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Caterpillar Inc.. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$316m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据显示,卡特彼勒公司的内部股东持股不到1%。这是一家非常大的公司,所以看到内部股东拥有大量公司股份是令人惊讶的。尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员持有价值3.16亿美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部股权是好事,但值得检查的是这些内部股东是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Caterpillar. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常由个人投资者组成的普通公众持有卡特彼勒公司的27%股份。虽然持股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Caterpillar better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Caterpillar (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

了解一家公司持股的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但要更好地理解卡特彼勒公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定该公司存在两个警告信号(其中一个可能非常严重),这是值得思考的。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发