share_log

After Losing 0.6% in the Past Year, JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 0.6% in the Past Year, JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在过去一年中下跌0.6%后,欢聚公司 (纳斯达克:YY) 的机构持有者一定会对最近的收益感到宽慰。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 07:21

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in JOYY implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insider ownership in JOYY is 41%
  • 机构对欢聚的实质性持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响。
  • 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司的52%股权。
  • 欢聚内部持有股份比例为41%。

A look at the shareholders of JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一眼欢聚公司(纳斯达克证券代码:YY)的股东们,我们就可以知道哪个群体最强大。 持有最大权益的是机构,持股比例为43%。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者如果出现下滑),这个群体将获益最大(或者损失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 3.6% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 0.6%.

机构投资者对上周股价的3.6%涨幅感到满意,因为他们一年的亏损总额达到了令人失望的0.6%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about JOYY.

让我们仔细查看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们什么关于欢聚。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:YY Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码YY 2024年6月24日持股情况分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JOYY?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于欢聚?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in JOYY. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see JOYY's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你看到的,机构投资者在欢聚中持有相当大的股权。这意味着服务于这些机构的分析师已经研究过这个股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在着'拥挤交易'的风险。当这种交易失败时,多个方承诺以最快的速度抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到欢聚的历史收益和营业收入,但要记住,故事还有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:YY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码YY 2024年6月24日收益和营业收入增长率分析

It looks like hedge funds own 6.0% of JOYY shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 30% stake, CEO Xueling Li is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.0% of the stock.

看起来,对冲基金拥有欢聚的6.0%股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是相当积极的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内创造价值(并提高股价)。首席执行官Xueling Li拥有30%的股份,是最大的股东。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有大约10%和6.0%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步了解后,我们发现52%的股份由前5名股东持有。 换句话说,这些股东对公司的决策有相当大的影响。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of JOYY

欢聚内部持股比例很高。内部人员在这家17亿美元的公司中拥有7.06亿美元的股份。这是非常有意义的。看看这里,看看这些内部人员最近是否有在购买。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,在管辖范围之间会有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理担任执行董事会成员并非不寻常,特别是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in JOYY Inc.. Insiders own US$706m worth of shares in the US$1.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

拥有10%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对欢聚有一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权可能不足以使政策决策朝他们的方向倾斜,但他们仍然可以对企业政策产生集体影响。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over JOYY. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体很值得注意,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经发现了对欢聚的3个警告信号(其中一个是值得关注的!),在你投资之前你应该了解清楚这些信息。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for JOYY (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体很值得注意,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经发现了对欢聚的3个警告信号(其中一个是值得关注的!),在你投资之前你应该了解清楚这些信息。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发