share_log

Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:628) Market Cap Increased by HK$720m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:628) Market Cap Increased by HK$720m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

国美金融科技股份有限公司(HKG:628)的市值增加了7.2亿港元,内部人员获得了38%的削减。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 18:58

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Gome Finance Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • Juan Du owns 61% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 内部人似乎对高盛金融科技的增长有着既得利益,从他们拥有的大量股权就可以看出。
  • 杜娟拥有公司的61%股份。
  • 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。

Every investor in Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd. (HKG:628) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位Gome Finance Technology Co.,Ltd.(HKG: 628)的投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,公司中个人内部人拥有该公司的绝大部分股权,拥有38%的股权。换言之,该群体对股票上涨受益最大(或者在经济下行时损失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$1.2b market cap following a 18% gain in the stock.

因此,内部人员上周得分最高,因为公司股票上涨18%后达到了12亿港元市值。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Gome Finance Technology.

下图中,我们可以放大看一下Gome Finance Technology的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:628 Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
SEHK: 628所有权分布图2024年6月24日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gome Finance Technology?

悟米金融科技缺乏机构投资者的持股信息告诉我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

通常,不活跃的小公司缺少机构投资者,但大公司缺少机构投资者则不太常见。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Gome Finance Technology, for yourself, below.

公司没有机构持股的原因有很多。通常,小型新上市公司不会引起基金经理太多关注,因为大型基金经理无法在该公司建立有意义的头寸。基金经理可能不持有该股票,因为他们不相信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能认为该企业的历史业绩不太好,或者可能涉及其他因素。您可以在下面查看悟米金融科技过去的营业收入业绩。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:628 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
SEHK:628收入和营业收入增长情况2024年6月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gome Finance Technology. Our data shows that Juan Du is the largest shareholder with 61% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Chun-Shun Ko is the second largest shareholder, holding 13%.

我们注意到,对于悟米金融科技,对冲基金没有一个有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,杜娟是最大的股东,持有该公司61%的股份。这意味着他们控制着公司未来的控制权。Chun-Shun Ko是第二大股东,持有13%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of Gome Finance Technology

悟米金融科技的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.2b, and insiders have HK$456m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人员在悟米金融科技公司中保持重要地位。其市值仅为12亿港元,而内部人员拥有价值4.56亿港元的股票。看到内部人员对公司这么有投入感觉很棒。值得注意的是,我们可以查看一下这些内部人员最近是否一直在购买股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,在公司中拥有14%的股份,因此不容忽视。与其他大股东的决策不同步时,这样的股权比例可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Gome Finance Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我认为查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是,为了真正了解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,Gome Finance Technology在我们的投资分析中显示出1个警告信号,您应该了解......

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发