share_log

With 86% Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 86% Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有86%股权,Evergy, Inc. (纳斯达克:EVRG)备受强有力的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 06:57

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Evergy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 20 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构持有Evergy的大量股份意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响力。
  • 前20大股东持有该公司50%的股份。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

Every investor in Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

纳斯达克:EVRG的每个投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到机构拥有该公司的绝大部分股份,占86%的所有权。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Evergy.

在下图中,我们放大了Evergy不同的所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:EVRG Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EVRG股权结构分析报告 2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Evergy?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于Evergy?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Evergy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Evergy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到Evergy确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会有一种“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方面可能竞相快速出售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Evergy的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多的情节。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:EVRG Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EVRG盈利和营收增长分析报告 2024年6月25日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Evergy. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有超过发行股票的一半,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对于Evergy来说,对冲基金持有的股数不多。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股东,持有14%的流通股。作为对比,第二大股东持有约7.4%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.9%的所有权。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们所有权数据的进一步观察表明,前20大股东持有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Evergy

Evergy的内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Evergy, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$39m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人持有Evergy,Inc.的股份不到1%。由于规模如此之大,我们不会期望内部人持有大量股票。总体而言,他们拥有3900万美元的股票。在这种情况下,更有趣的是看看这些内部人是否一直在购买或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我认为查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是为了获得真正的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - Cadence银行有3个需要引起我们关注的警告信号。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Evergy (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

我发现对于公司股权结构的探究非常有趣,但要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了Evergy的2个警告信号(其中1个令人担忧!)您应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发