Individual Investors Among Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002250) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.1% Price Drop
Individual Investors Among Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002250) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.1% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 30% of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd
- 联化科技有限公司个人投资者持有的大量股份表明,他们共同在管理和业务策略方面拥有更大的话语权。
- 前25名股东持有46%的股份。
- 内部人员持有联化科技有限公司30%的股份。
Every investor in Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002250) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 53% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位联化科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002250)的投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。拥有53%股份的个人投资者在公司中拥有最大的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或下跌),该集团将获得最大的收益(或承受最大的损失)。
Following a 8.1% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 30% stock also took a hit.
上周股价下跌8.1%,个人投资者遭受最大的损失,但持有30%股份的内部人员也受到了打击。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究联化科技有限公司的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd?
机构投资者持有联化科技有限公司相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者之间存在一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有某只股票时,总会存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速售出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看联化科技有限公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更复杂的。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
从机构投资者持有的数量来看,他们在联化科技有限公司中持有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者之间存在一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有某只股票时,总会存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速售出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看联化科技有限公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更复杂的。
Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Jinxiang Mou, with ownership of 25%. AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.0% of common stock, and Youzhi Zhang holds about 2.4% of the company stock.
联化科技有限公司不是由对冲基金持有的。该公司最大的股东是Jinxiang Mou,持有25%的股份,荷兰宏利兴业基金管理有限公司持有普通股的4.0%,Youzhi Zhang持有该公司约2.4%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd
联化科技有限公司内部人员持有合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为44亿元人民币,公司内部人员持有13亿元人民币的股份,非常有价值。值得关注的是,它可能值得检查那些内部人员最近有没有进行购买。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lianhe Chemical Technology Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.4b, and insiders have CN¥1.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
从普通公众持有的大量股份来看,联化科技有限公司是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模赋予了普通公众投资者一定的集体权力,他们可能会影响公司执行薪酬、股息政策和拟议的业务收购决策。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
虽然考虑到拥有一家公司的不同群体是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经为联化科技有限公司确定了1个警告信号,你应该知道的。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Lianhe Chemical TechnologyLtd that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经为联化科技有限公司识别出了1个警告信号,你应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。