Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Nabors Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构持有的股份高显著地暗示纳伯斯实业的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 前十大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
为了更好地了解纳伯斯实业有哪些人真正掌控,了解公司的所有权结构非常重要。而拥有最多股份的是拥有78%所有权的机构。换句话说,该群体的投资在公司中最有可能赚取最多(或损失最多)。
Last week's US$76m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 26% losses.
上周美元市值增长7600万美元将很可能受到机构投资者的欣赏,尤其是经历了一年26%亏损之后。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nabors Industries.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注纳伯斯实业的不同所有权群体。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-6b88cbf3f90bbbd0c58c46b15f0ee34e-0-201c403436521b87236fff28a15e973b.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nabors Industries?
机构持有情况是什么告诉我们有关纳伯斯实业的信息呢?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nabors Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nabors Industries, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在纳伯斯实业中拥有相当大的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好要警惕依靠机构投资者所带来所谓的认可。他们也会有错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,见到股价暴跌也不足为奇。所以最好还是查看纳伯斯实业过去的盈利轨迹,(下面),当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240626/0-6b88cbf3f90bbbd0c58c46b15f0ee34e-1-b7db25f01b47063018ff2039164c65bd.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Nabors Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 5.2% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Anthony Petrello directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上股份,因此他们可以集体施加重大影响力。纳伯斯实业不是由对冲基金拥有的。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大的股东,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有股票的比例分别为8.6%和5.2%。此外,该公司的首席执行官安东尼·佩特雷洛直接持有总流通股的3.9%。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进一步了解到,前10大股东持有通富微电大约51%的注册资本,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,能够在某种程度上平衡彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Nabors Industries
纳伯斯实业内部股权持有情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Nabors Industries Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$668m, and insiders have US$39m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们可以看到内部人持有纳伯斯实业的股票。它的市值仅为6.68亿美元,内部人在自己名下拥有3900万美元的股份。看到内部人有一些投资是好的,但值得检查的是那些内部人是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Nabors Industries. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有纳伯斯实业16%的股份。尽管占有相当大的股份,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nabors Industries better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑拥有某家公司股份的不同群体总是有价值的。但是,为了更好地了解纳伯斯实业,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com