Individual Investors Account for 50% of United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688469) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 16%
Individual Investors Account for 50% of United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688469) Ownership, While Private Equity Firms Account for 16%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over United Nova TechnologyLtd by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- 11% of United Nova TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
- 个人投资者对United Nova TechnologyLtd的重大控制意味着普通公众拥有更多影响公司管理和治理相关决策的权力。
- 前15名股东持有该公司50%的业务。
- 机构持有United Nova TechnologyLtd 的股份占比11%。
Every investor in United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688469) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
United Nova Technology Co.,Ltd.(SHSE:688469)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体,并拥有50%的所有权的个人投资者的利益最大。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Private equity firms, on the other hand, account for 16% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,私募股权公司持有该公司16%的股份。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of United Nova TechnologyLtd.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了United Nova TechnologyLtd不同股权组的比例。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-4077cd9ecca2a87e953aec51a52b26d5-0-d03e2223e607c94be20f0a0fd808ac70.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About United Nova TechnologyLtd?
机构投资者对United Nova TechnologyLtd传达了什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in United Nova TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see United Nova TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在United Nova TechnologyLtd中持有相当大的股份。这表明公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者的所谓验证。他们也有时会犯错。当多个机构持有股票时,总会有一个风险,即他们投资于一个已成众人瞩目的股票。当这样的交易走错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于一个没有增长记录的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到United Nova TechnologyLtd的历史收益和营业收入,但要记住,故事背后总有更多的东西。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240627/0-4077cd9ecca2a87e953aec51a52b26d5-1-68dbe8e5e3296399cfc4e772c193ccae.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in United Nova TechnologyLtd. Zhongxin Technology Private Equity Fund Management (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Shanghai Xingcheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.
对于United Nova TechnologyLtd,对冲基金并没有持有太多股份。中芯国际目前是该公司最大的股东,持有16%的流通股,其次是持有14%普通股的上海兴城投资管理有限公司,以及持有约4.0%公司股票的某些私募股权公司。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东名册上可以看出,50%的所有权由前15名股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有大多数的所有权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。
Insider Ownership Of United Nova TechnologyLtd
United Nova TechnologyLtd的内部股权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起来,私营企业拥有安徽皖能电力股票的58%。这值得深入挖掘。如果相关方,如内部人士,在其中一家私营企业中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 50% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
其他基金类型没有拥有招商南油的实质性投资。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
作为持有16%股份的私募股权公司,私募股权公司处于塑造以价值创造为重点的公司战略的位置。有些投资者可能对此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励帮助市场看到公司价值的战略。或者这些股东可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 8.4%, of the United Nova TechnologyLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起来,私人公司拥有United Nova TechnologyLtd的8.4%股份。私人公司可能属于相关方。有时内部人员通过在私营公司中持股而非以个人身份拥有对公共公司的利益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是作为进一步研究领域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 14% of United Nova TechnologyLtd stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
公共公司目前拥有United Nova TechnologyLtd的14%股份。很难说得准,但这表明它们拥有交织的业务利益。这可能是一项战略股份,因此值得关注此领域的所有权变化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for United Nova TechnologyLtd that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑所有占有公司份额的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经发现了United Nova TechnologyLtd的2个警告信号,您在投资此处之前应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com