share_log

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在过去的一年中,Amplitude,Inc.(纳斯达克:AMPL)已经损失了22%,机构股东对最近的收益感到宽慰
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 06:22

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Amplitude implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders own 15% of Amplitude
  • 机构在振幅公司的实质性持股意味着它们对该公司的股价有重要影响。
  • 该公司共有8个股东拥有51%的股权。
  • 内部持有振幅公司15%的股份。

If you want to know who really controls Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 49% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解谁真正控制了Amplitude,Inc. (纳斯达克: AMPL),那么您必须看看其股权登记表的构成。持有最大比例的是占公司股份49%的机构。换言之,该组织有可能从其对该公司的投资中获得最多的收益(或损失最多)。

After a year of 22% losses, last week's 5.2% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

经历了22%的亏损一整年后,上周的5.2%的涨幅可能是机构投资者欢迎的一种迹象,表明回报可能开始上升。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Amplitude, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨振幅的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AMPL Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
NasdaqCM:AMPL股权结构于2024年6月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amplitude?

机构持股告诉我们关于振幅的一些信息。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Amplitude does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amplitude's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,振幅确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司的大部分股票。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是像任何其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总是存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出问题时,多个方面可能会争相快速出售股票。这种风险在一家没有成长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到振幅的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是有更多的内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AMPL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
NasdaqCM:AMPL盈利和营收增长于2024年6月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Amplitude. Sequoia Capital Operations LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.4% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Battery Ventures and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.3%. In addition, we found that Spenser Skates, the CEO has 5.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

对于振幅,对冲基金并没有持有太多股票。Sequoia Capital Operations LLC目前是该公司的最大股东,持有已发行股份的8.4%。第二和第三大股东是Battery Ventures和T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,他们各自持有7.3%的股份。此外,我们发现CEO Spenser Skates持有分配给他们的5.2%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Amplitude

振幅的内部持有人

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Amplitude, Inc.. Insiders own US$155m worth of shares in the US$1.0b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人拥有振幅公司的合理比例。内部人在这家总市值为10亿美元的公司中拥有价值1.55亿美元的股份。这相当有意义。很高兴看到这种投资水平。您可以在这里查看这些内部人最近是否一直在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众(包括散户投资者)拥有公司的20%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这个群体不能必然占据主导地位,但它肯定可以对公司的运营产生实际的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

作为16%的股权,私人股权公司在以创造价值为重点的企业战略制定方面扮演着重要角色。有些人会喜欢这种情况,因为私人股权公司有时候是激进派,使管理层责任制水平更高。但还有些时候,私募股权公司则是在将公司上市后就卖掉。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Amplitude , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我认为了解一家公司的真正业主非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的持续存在。我们已经识别出振幅公司的2个警示信号,理解它们应该是您的投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发