share_log

With 80% Ownership, Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 80% Ownership, Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有80%所有权的汉考克惠特尼公司(NASDAQ:HWC)拥有强大的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 08:59

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Hancock Whitney implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构持有汉考克惠特尼的大量股份意味着他们对公司股价具有重要影响力。
  • 共有12家投资者拥有51%的控股权。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ:HWC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

为了更好地了解控制汉考克惠特尼公司(纳斯达克代码:HWC)的人员,了解公司的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,机构持有公司80%的股份,是该公司的主要股东。换句话说,该集团从公司的投资中获得最多利益(或者损失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hancock Whitney, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解汉考克惠特尼的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HWC Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
纳斯达克GS:HWC所有权分布2024年6月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hancock Whitney?

机构持股对汉考克惠特尼有什么影响?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Hancock Whitney already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hancock Whitney's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

汉考克惠特尼已经有机构投资者持有股票。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经关注了这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看汉考克惠特尼以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HWC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
纳斯达克GS:HWC收益和营业收入成长2024年6月27日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hancock Whitney. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. With 11% and 5.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投资者应该注意到,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上,因此他们可以集体行使重要的权力。我们注意到,对汉考克惠特尼没有实质性投资的对冲基金。公司最大股东是贝莱德,拥有14%的股份。其次是第二大和第三大股东,分别是辉瑞公司和文理多维度基金公司,持有公司发行的11%和5.6%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考虑到前12名股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Hancock Whitney

汉考克惠特尼内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hancock Whitney Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$34m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人拥有汉考克惠特尼公司不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,而内部人拥有价值3400万美元的股份。绝对价值可能比比例份额更重要。可以点击此处查看内部人是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众(包括零售投资者)持有该公司19%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。尽管这样的持股规模相当可观,但如果决策不与其他大股东一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发