Shenzhen Fortune Trend Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688318) Largest Shareholder, CEO Shan Huang Sees Holdings Value Fall by 3.8% Following Recent Drop
Shenzhen Fortune Trend Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688318) Largest Shareholder, CEO Shan Huang Sees Holdings Value Fall by 3.8% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- Shan Huang owns 68% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 内部人似乎对深圳财富趋势科技的增长很有兴趣,从他们占有的大量股权可以看出。
- 黄山拥有该公司的68%股权。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688318) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看深圳财富趋势科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688318)的股东,可以发现哪个群体最有实力。 我们可以看到,个人内部人拥有该公司71%的所有权。 换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And following last week's 3.8% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上周的股价下跌3.8%之后,内部人遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology.
让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东告诉我们关于深圳财富趋势技术的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology?
机构投资者持有了相当大的股份,这可以表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。它们也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,那么看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看深圳财富趋势科技的过去收益历程(如下所示)。当然,还要记住考虑其他因素。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所见,机构投资者在深圳财富趋势科技中持有相当大的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。它们也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,那么看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看深圳财富趋势科技的过去收益历程(如下所示)。当然,还要记住考虑其他因素。
Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Shan Huang is the largest shareholder with 68% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. GF Fund Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.0% of common stock, and Qing Huang holds about 0.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Qing Huang is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
深圳财富趋势技术不是由对冲基金持有。该公司的CEO黄山拥有68%的流通股份。鉴于这样的巨大持股,我们推断他们对公司未来具有重大控制权。当内部人拥有公司中重要数量的股份时,通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人员拥有这样的股权。广发基金管理有限公司是第二大股东,拥有1%的普通股,Qing Huang持有该公司约0.8%的股票。有趣的是,第三大股东Qing Huang也是董事会成员,这再次表明公司高层管理人员持有重要的内部股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology
深圳财富趋势科技的内部人拥有的股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥15b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥11b worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,深圳财富趋势科技有限公司的内部人拥有超过一半的股份。这使他们有效地控制了公司。考虑到其市值为150亿元人民币,这意味着内部人员拥有高达110亿元人民币的股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们投资。您可能希望了解他们是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
通常是个人投资者持有了深圳财富趋势科技24%的股份。虽然该集团不能必然决定事情,但它肯定可以对公司的经营产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Shenzhen Fortune Trend technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看公司的股权是非常有趣的。但是,要真正获得见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑风险-深圳财富趋势科技有1个警告标记,我们认为您应该了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com