share_log

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

个人投资者是Orchestra BioMed Holdings,Inc.(纳斯达克:OBIO)最大的股东,在市值上涨了7300万美元后获得了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 06:30

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Orchestra BioMed Holdings by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 个人投资者对Orchestra BioMed Holdings的重要控制意味着普通公众对管理和治理相关决策有更大的影响力。
  • 前六大股东持有该业务的52%。
  • 最近有内部人员购买。

If you want to know who really controls Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OBIO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道谁真正控制Orchestra BioMed Holdings Inc.(NASDAQ:OBIO),则必须查看其股份登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司37%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或如果市场出现下滑,则获益最多的是该群体。)

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$73m last week.

显然,上周公司市值上涨7300万美元后,个人投资者获益最多。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨Orchestra BioMed Holdings的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:OBIO Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:OBIO 2024年6月28日股权结构拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Orchestra BioMed Holdings?

机构股东对Orchestra BioMed Holdings有什么影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Orchestra BioMed Holdings中持有相当多的权益。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这支股票,并且喜欢它。但是,就像其他任何人一样,他们可能会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,则经常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Orchestra BioMed Holdings的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:OBIO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:OBIO收入和营收增长2024年6月28日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of Orchestra BioMed Holdings. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Medtronic plc is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO David Hochman is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.

我们的数据表明,对Orchestra BioMed Holdings的股权投资占16%。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。Medtronic plc是目前最大的股东,持有16%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的16%和7.1%。此外,首席执行官David Hochman拥有公司股份的0.7%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的挖掘,发现前六位股东占注册表的约52%,这意味着除较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,因此在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Orchestra BioMed Holdings

Orchestra BioMed Holdings的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$246m, and insiders have US$6.0m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股东可能会对此感兴趣,因为内部人持有Orchestra BioMed Holdings股票。它的市值仅为2.46亿美元,内部人拥有自己命名的600万美元股票。这至少表明了一些对齐。您可以单击此处查看内部人是否一直在购买或销售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有37%所有权的普通公众,主要是个人投资者,对Orchestra BioMed Holdings有一定的影响力。尽管所有权规模相当,但如果决策与其他大股东不协调,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Orchestra BioMed Holdings board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

拥有12%股权的私募股权公司可能会影响Orchestra BioMed Holdings董事会。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓励,因为私募股权公司有时能够提倡有助于市场看到公司价值的战略。或者,这些持有人可能在将其公开后退出投资。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 16% of the Orchestra BioMed Holdings shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们可以看到,上市公司持有Orchestra BioMed Holdings已发行股份的16%。难以确定,但这表明它们具有交织的业务利益。这可能是战略投资,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Orchestra BioMed Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Orchestra BioMed Holdings has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

思考拥有股票的不同群体总是值得的。但是,要更好地了解Orchestra BioMed Holdings,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,承担风险-Orchestra BioMed Holdings存在3个警告标志(1个无法忽略),我们认为您应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发