share_log

While Institutions Invested in Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) Benefited From Last Week's 20% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) Benefited From Last Week's 20% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

当机构投资卡特银行股份公司(纳斯达克:CARE)从上周的20%增长中受益时,零售投资者获得了最大利益
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 09:58

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Carter Bankshares' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 41% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 42% of Carter Bankshares is held by Institutions
  • Carter Bankshares拥有大量散户投资者的所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
  • 41% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
  • 42% 的卡特银行股份由机构持有

If you want to know who really controls Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了卡特银行股份有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CARE),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。散户投资者拥有该公司的最大股份,拥有54%的股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$304m last week, while institutions who own 42% also benefitted.

上周市值触及3.04亿美元后,散户投资者涨幅最大,而持有42%的机构也从中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Carter Bankshares.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于卡特银行股份的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CARE Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NASDAQGS: CARE 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 28 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Carter Bankshares?

关于卡特银行股票,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Carter Bankshares does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Carter Bankshares' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,Carter Bankshares确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Carter Bankshares的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CARE Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NASDAQGS: CARE 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 28 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Carter Bankshares. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 7.1% of shares outstanding. With 5.8% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, AllianceBernstein L.P. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

对冲基金在卡特银行股票中持有的股票不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是贝莱德公司,其已发行股份占7.1%。AllianceBernstein L.P. 和Vanguard Group, Inc.分别占已发行股份的5.8%和5.4%,是第二和第三大股东。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Carter Bankshares

卡特银行股份的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Carter Bankshares, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$12m worth of stock in the US$304m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Carter Bankshares, Inc.的股份。内部人士以自己的名义拥有这家价值3.04亿美元的公司价值1200万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in Carter Bankshares, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Carter Bankshares54%的大量股份,这表明它是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模赋予了公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以而且可能确实会影响有关高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议业务收购的决策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Carter Bankshares .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在Carter Bankshares上发现的1个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发