share_log

The Past Three Years for Chacha Food Company (SZSE:002557) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Three Years for Chacha Food Company (SZSE:002557) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

对于洽洽食品公司(SZSE:002557)的投资者来说,过去三年并没有盈利。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 19:39

These days it's easy to simply buy an index fund, and your returns should (roughly) match the market. In contrast individual stocks will provide a wide range of possible returns, and may fall short. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Chacha Food Company, Limited (SZSE:002557) shareholders, since the share price is down 37% in the last three years, less than the market decline of around 27%. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 32% in the last year. Furthermore, it's down 23% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders.

现在很容易买入指数基金,你的回报应该(大致)与市场相匹配,但个别股票提供了各种可能的回报范围,并且可能表现不佳。不幸的是,长期持有洽洽食品有限公司(SZSE:002557)的股东在过去三年中股价下跌37%,低于市场下跌约27%。更近期的买家也很吃亏,去年下跌32%,一个季度内下跌23%。对于股东来说这并不好玩。

So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那么我们来看看这家公司的长期表现是否符合其业务进展情况。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯维尔超级投资者》中,沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式。考虑市场对公司的看法如何发生变化的一个不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的变动进行比较。股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是理性反映企业价值的情况。通过比较每股收益(EPS)和股价随时间的变化,我们可以了解投资者对公司的态度如何随着时间而变化。

During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Chacha Food Company actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.6% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

在不幸的三年股票价格下跌期间,洽洽食品公司实际上每年的每股收益(EPS)提高了0.6%。考虑到股票价格的反应,人们可能会怀疑EPS不是该期间业务表现的良好指标(可能是由于一次性损失或收益),或者公司过去过于炒作,因此增长令人失望。

It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. But it's possible a look at other metrics will be enlightening.

我们认为市场在三年前可能过于看好增长预期,但通过看其他指标可能会更有启迪。

Revenue is actually up 9.8% over the three years, so the share price drop doesn't seem to hinge on revenue, either. It's probably worth investigating Chacha Food Company further; while we may be missing something on this analysis, there might also be an opportunity.

营业收入实际上在过去三年中增长了9.8%,因此股价下跌似乎并不取决于营业收入。进一步研究洽洽食品公司可能值得,虽然在此分析中我们可能遗漏了一些东西,但也可能存在机会。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以看到以下收益和营收的变化情况(通过单击图像了解精确值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002557 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
SZSE:002557收益和营收增长截至2024年6月28日

Chacha Food Company is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

洽洽食品公司为投资者所熟知,许多聪明的分析师试图预测未来的利润水平。因此,我们建议查看这份显示共识预测的免费报告 。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Chacha Food Company, it has a TSR of -32% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)和股票回报之间的差异。 TSR包括任何剥离或折让的资本筹集(基于股息被重新投资的假设),以及任何股息。因此,对于支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回报高得多。就中国神威药业集团而言,其TSR在过去5年中达到了75%。这超过了我们之前提到的股票回报。该公司支付的股息已经提高了总股东回报。总股东回报股票回报TSR包括任何剥离或折价融资的价值,以及任何股息,基于股息再投资的假设。对于支付股息的股票而言,TSR给出了更完整的图景。对于洽洽食品公司,过去3年的TSR为-32%。这超过了我们之前提到的股价回报。毫无疑问,股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

While the broader market lost about 16% in the twelve months, Chacha Food Company shareholders did even worse, losing 30% (even including dividends). However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 3% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. Keeping this in mind, a solid next step might be to take a look at Chacha Food Company's dividend track record. This free interactive graph is a great place to start.

虽然广泛市场在12个月内下跌约16%,洽洽食品公司的股东表现更差,损失了30%(包括股息)。然而,股价可能仅仅受到了更广泛的市场焦虑的影响。如果有一个好机会,值得关注基本面。好消息是,长期持有期间,股东获得了盈利,每年增长了3%的红利。最近的抛售可能是一个机会,因此值得检查基本数据以了解长期增长趋势的迹象。一定要记住,下一步可靠的方法可能是查看洽洽食品公司的股息历史记录。这个免费的交互式图表是一个很好的开始。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果您愿意查看另一家公司(具有潜在的更好财务状况),请不要错过这个免费的公司列表,证明它们可以增长收益。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发