share_log

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get First Hawaiian (NASDAQ:FHB) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Three Years

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get First Hawaiian (NASDAQ:FHB) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Three Years

过去三年,正面的收益增长并不能为first hawaiian(纳斯达克股票代码:FHB)的股东带来良好的回报。
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 08:51

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term First Hawaiian, Inc. (NASDAQ:FHB) shareholders, since the share price is down 29% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 18%.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是选股的风险在于,你可能会买入表现不佳的公司。不幸的是,第一夏威夷公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FHB)的长期股东就是这种情况,因为股价在过去三年中下跌了29%,远低于18%左右的市场回报率。

While the stock has risen 3.5% in the past week but long term shareholders are still in the red, let's see what the fundamentals can tell us.

尽管该股在过去一周上涨了3.5%,但长期股东仍处于亏损状态,但让我们看看基本面能告诉我们什么。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, First Hawaiian actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 3.4% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

在不幸的三年股价下跌中,First Hawaiian的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长3.4%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。否则,该公司过去曾被过度炒作,因此其增长令人失望。

It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. But it's possible a look at other metrics will be enlightening.

在我们看来,三年前市场对增长可能过于乐观。但是,看看其他指标可能会有所启发。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. We like that First Hawaiian has actually grown its revenue over the last three years. But it's not clear to us why the share price is down. It might be worth diving deeper into the fundamentals, lest an opportunity goes begging.

我们注意到,股息似乎足够健康,因此这可能无法解释股价下跌的原因。我们喜欢 First Hawaiian 的收入在过去三年中实际上有所增长。但是我们不清楚为什么股价下跌。可能值得深入研究基本面,以免机会流失。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何随着时间的推移而变化(点击图片了解确切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FHB Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
NASDAQGS: FHB 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 29 日

You can see how its balance sheet has strengthened (or weakened) over time in this free interactive graphic.

您可以在这张免费的交互式图片中看到其资产负债表如何随着时间的推移而增强(或减弱)。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of First Hawaiian, it has a TSR of -19% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。就第一夏威夷人而言,在过去3年的股东总回报率为-19%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。因此,该公司支付的股息提高了 股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

First Hawaiian shareholders have received returns of 21% over twelve months (even including dividends), which isn't far from the general market return. That gain looks pretty satisfying, and it is even better than the five-year TSR of 0.2% per year. Even if the share price growth slows down from here, there's a good chance that this is business worth watching in the long term. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with First Hawaiian .

夏威夷第一股东在十二个月内获得了21%的回报(甚至包括股息),这与总体市场回报率相差不远。这种涨幅看起来相当令人满意,甚至比每年0.2%的五年期股东总回报率还要好。即使股价增长从现在开始放缓,从长远来看,这很可能是值得关注的业务。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在 First Hawaiian 身上发现的 1 个警告标志。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果你想看看另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优异的公司——那么千万不要错过这份已经证明自己可以增加收益的公司的免费名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发