share_log

1st Source Corporation's (NASDAQ:SRCE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

1st Source Corporation's (NASDAQ:SRCE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

纳斯达克:1st Source Corporation(SRCE)的大型机构持有者必须感到高兴,因为股票保持强劲,过去一周上涨6.4%
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 08:54

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies 1st Source's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高机构所有权意味着1st Source的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有9名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

To get a sense of who is truly in control of 1st Source Corporation (NASDAQ:SRCE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了1st Source Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:SRCE),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为47%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$79m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 31% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了7900万美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前,一年股东回报率为31%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of 1st Source, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究1st Source的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SRCE Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:SRCE 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About 1st Source?

关于第一来源,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

1st Source already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see 1st Source's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

1st Source的股票登记处已经有机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到1st Source的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SRCE Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:SRCE 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 29 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in 1st Source. With a 18% stake, CEO Christopher Murphy is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对冲基金在 1st Source 中的股票不多。首席执行官克里斯托弗·墨菲持有18%的股份,是最大股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的6.4%和5.9%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of 1st Source

第一来源的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in 1st Source Corporation. Insiders own US$403m worth of shares in the US$1.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有第一来源公司的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家13亿美元公司价值4.03亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司19%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for 1st Source that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经为第一来源确定了 1 个警告标志,你应该注意这一点。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发