share_log

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

机构投资者控制着美国独立银行股份公司(纳斯达克: IBCP)的74%,在股票上涨13%后上周获得回报
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 09:41

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高机构所有权意味着独立银行的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 52% 的业务由前 12 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

A look at the shareholders of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看独立银行公司(纳斯达克股票代码:IBCP)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为74%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's 13% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 66% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周13%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,一年股东回报率为66%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于独立银行的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:IBCP Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:IBCP所有权明细 2024年6月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

关于独立银行,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Independent Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Independent Bank's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

独立银行已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看独立银行的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:IBCP Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:IBCP 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 29 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 7.4% of Independent Bank shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that William Kessel, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。看来独立银行7.4%的股票由对冲基金控制。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是贝莱德公司,其已发行股份的13%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.4%和5.2%。此外,我们发现首席执行官威廉·凯塞尔将0.7%的股份分配给了他们的名字。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记处,我们可以看到52%的所有权由前12名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数权益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

独立银行的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Independent Bank Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$533m, and insiders have US$13m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有独立银行公司的股份。它的市值仅为5.33亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值1300万美元的股票。很高兴看到内部人士进行一些投资,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Independent Bank. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有16%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对独立银行有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Independent Bank (including 1 which is significant) .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们在独立银行发现的两个警告信号(包括一个重要的警告信号)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发