share_log

With 57% Ownership in Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 57% Ownership in Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在人民银行股份公司拥有57%股权的情况下(纳斯达克:PEBO),机构投资者在业务上有很多风险。
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 10:10

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Peoples Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 24 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 各机构持有人民银行的大量股权意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 前24名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

If you want to know who really controls Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着人民银行公司(纳斯达克股票代码:PEBO),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为57%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.0b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 19% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周,在该公司的市值达到10亿美元之后,机构投资者最终受益最大。目前,一年股东回报率为19%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Peoples Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Peoples Bancorp的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:PEBO Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:PEBO所有权明细 2024年6月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peoples Bancorp?

关于人民银行,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Peoples Bancorp. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Peoples Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在人民银行拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看人民银行过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:PEBO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS:PEBO收益和收入增长 2024年6月29日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Peoples Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对人民银行进行有意义的投资。贝莱德公司目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为7.8%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.1%和5.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前24名股东拥有公司50%的合并所有权,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Peoples Bancorp

人民银行的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Peoples Bancorp Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$39m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有人民银行公司的部分股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值3900万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司39%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Peoples Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Peoples Bancorp you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解人民银行,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了两个你应该注意的 People Bancorp 警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发