share_log

The Past Three Years for Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Three Years for Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

莫霍克工业公司(纽交所:MHK)投资者过去三年并不赚钱。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 06:12

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But if you try your hand at stock picking, you risk returning less than the market. We regret to report that long term Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MHK) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 42% in three years, versus a market return of about 18%.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是,如果你尝试选股,你的回报率可能会低于市场。我们遗憾地报告,莫霍克工业公司(纽约证券交易所代码:MHK)的长期股东有过这样的经历,股价在三年内下跌了42%,而市场回报率约为18%。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

考虑到这一点,值得一看公司的基本面是否是长期业绩的驱动力,或者是否存在一些差异。

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

虽然市场是一种强大的定价机制,但股价反映了投资者的情绪,而不仅仅是潜在的业务表现。考虑市场对公司的看法发生了怎样的变化的一种不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价走势进行比较。

We know that Mohawk Industries has been profitable in the past. On the other hand, it reported a trailing twelve months loss, suggesting it isn't reliably profitable. Other metrics may better explain the share price move.

我们知道莫霍克工业公司过去一直盈利。另一方面,它报告了过去十二个月的亏损,这表明它无法可靠地盈利。其他指标可以更好地解释股价走势。

The company has kept revenue pretty healthy over the last three years, so we doubt that explains the falling share price. There doesn't seem to be any clear correlation between the fundamental business metrics and the share price. That could mean that the stock was previously overrated, or it could spell opportunity now.

该公司在过去三年中一直保持相当不错的收入,因此我们怀疑这是股价下跌的原因。基本业务指标与股价之间似乎没有任何明确的相关性。这可能意味着该股此前被高估了,也可能意味着现在的机会。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何随着时间的推移而变化(点击图片了解确切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MHK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
纽约证券交易所:MHK收益和收入增长 2024年7月1日

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

可能值得注意的是,首席执行官的薪水低于类似规模公司的中位数。始终值得关注首席执行官的薪酬,但更重要的问题是公司多年来是否会增加收益。因此,我们建议您查看这份显示共识预测的免费报告

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Mohawk Industries provided a TSR of 10% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 4% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Mohawk Industries .

在过去的十二个月中,莫霍克工业公司的股东回报率为10%。但是这种回报不及市场。但至少这还是个好处!在过去的五年中,股东总回报率在五年内每年下降4%。很可能是业务正在稳定下来。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在莫霍克工业公司发现的1个警告信号。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果你想看看另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优异的公司——那么千万不要错过这份已经证明自己可以增加收益的公司的免费名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发