share_log

The Past Three Years for Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Three Years for Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

繁德信息技术(纽交所:FIS)投资者在过去3年中并没有获利
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 08:13

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But if you try your hand at stock picking, you risk returning less than the market. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE:FIS) shareholders, since the share price is down 48% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 18%.

为了证明选择个股的努力是值得的,值得竭尽全力去超越市场指数基金的回报。 但是,如果你试着挑选股票,你有可能会比市场回报少。 不幸的是,对于长期持有Fidelity National Information Services,Inc. (NYSE:FIS)的股东来说,情况一直如此,因为股价在过去三年中下跌了48%,远远落后于市场回报率约18%。

Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.

由于股东们长期以来都亏损了,因此让我们回顾过去一段时间的基本面,看看是否一直与收益相一致。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

市场有时候是有效的,但价格并不总是反映公司的基本业务表现。通过比较每股收益和股价变化,我们可以了解投资者对公司的看法如何随着时间变化而变化。

During five years of share price growth, Fidelity National Information Services moved from a loss to profitability. We would usually expect to see the share price rise as a result. So it's worth looking at other metrics to try to understand the share price move.

在五年的股价上涨中,Fidelity National Information Services从亏损走向了盈利。 我们通常会期望看到股价上升。 所以值得看其他指标来尝试了解股价走势。

The modest 1.9% dividend yield is unlikely to be guiding the market view of the stock. Arguably the revenue decline of 5.0% per year has people thinking Fidelity National Information Services is shrinking. And that's not surprising, since it seems unlikely that EPS growth can continue for long in the absence of revenue growth.

仅有的1.9%的股息收益率不太可能引导市场对这只股票的看法。 有人认为Fidelity National Information Services每年下降5.0%的营业收入表明公司正在缩小规模。这并不让人意外,因为在没有营收增长的情况下,EPS增长似乎不可能继续下去。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的图表显示了收益和营收随时间的变化情况(通过单击图像揭示确切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FIS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
纽交所:FIS 2024年7月1日的盈利和营业收入增长

Fidelity National Information Services is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. If you are thinking of buying or selling Fidelity National Information Services stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst consensus estimates for future profits.

Fidelity National Information Services广受投资者认可,很多聪明的分析师试图预测未来的利润水平。如果你考虑购买或出售Fidelity National Information Services的股票,你应该查看这份免费报告,其中显示了未来利润的分析师共识预测。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Fidelity National Information Services, it has a TSR of -44% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

对于任何给定的股票来说,考虑到总股东回报和股价回报同样重要。 TSR结合了任何分拆或折价融资的价值,以及基于股息再投资的任何股息。可以说,TSR给具有支付股息的股票提供了更完整的图片。就Fidelity National Information Services而言,过去3年的TSR为-44%。这超过了我们先前提到的股价回报。毫无疑问,分红付款在很大程度上解释了这种差异!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

It's good to see that Fidelity National Information Services has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 34% in the last twelve months. That's including the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 6% per year over five years. This makes us a little wary, but the business might have turned around its fortunes. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Fidelity National Information Services you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

很高兴看到Fidelity National Information Services在过去十二个月中以股东总回报率34%的表现回报了股东。这已经包括股息了。 这些最近的回报无疑比五年中每年-6%的TSR亏损要好得多。 这使我们有些担心,但该业务可能已经扭转了命运。 考虑到市场条件对股价的影响可以产生不同的影响,因此还有其他更重要的因素。 例如:我们已经发现您应该注意的Fidelity National Information Services的4个警告信号,其中1个有些不愉快。

Of course Fidelity National Information Services may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

当然,Fidelity National Information Services可能不是最好的股票可供购买。 因此,您可能希望查看这些增长股的免费合集。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发