Insiders At Hamilton Insurance Group Sold US$1.5m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness
Insiders At Hamilton Insurance Group Sold US$1.5m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness
Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (NYSE:HG) shareholders might have a reason to worry after multiple insiders sold their shares over the last year. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag.
纽交所保险业集团的股东可能会担心,在过去一年里,多名内部人士都减持了其股票。当评估内部交易时,了解内部人员的买卖情况通常更有帮助,因为内部人士卖出股票可能有多种解释,然而,当数名内部人士在特定时间段内卖出股票时,股东应该注意,因为这可能是一个警示信号。
While we would never suggest that investors should base their decisions solely on what the directors of a company have been doing, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing.
虽然我们绝不建议投资者仅基于公司董事所做的事情来作出决策,但我们认为密切关注内部人士所做的事情是完全合理的。
The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Hamilton Insurance Group
Hamilton保险集团的内部交易过去12个月
Over the last year, we can see that the biggest insider sale was by the Independent Director, William Freda, for US$446k worth of shares, at about US$15.00 per share. That means that even when the share price was below the current price of US$16.65, an insider wanted to cash in some shares. When an insider sells below the current price, it suggests that they considered that lower price to be fair. That makes us wonder what they think of the (higher) recent valuation. However, while insider selling is sometimes discouraging, it's only a weak signal. We note that the biggest single sale was only 10% of William Freda's holding.
在过去的一年里,我们可以看到独立董事William Freda的最大内部交易是卖出446,000美元的股票,每股价格约为15.00美元。这意味着即使股价低于当前的16.65美元,内部人士也想要出售一些股票。当内部人员低于当前价格出售股票时,这表明他们认为较低的价格是公平的。这让我们想知道他们对(更高)最近的估值是怎么看的。然而,尽管内部人员的卖出有时令人担忧,但这仅仅是一个弱信号。我们注意到,最大的单次卖出仅占William Freda持股量的10%。
Happily, we note that in the last year insiders paid US$756k for 47.80k shares. On the other hand they divested 99.00k shares, for US$1.5m. Over the last year we saw more insider selling of Hamilton Insurance Group shares, than buying. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date!
令人高兴的是,在过去的一年里,内部人士支付了756,000美元购买了47.80k股股票。另一方面,他们卖出了99,000股,总价值为1.5m美元。在过去的一年里,我们看到Hamilton Insurance Group的内部人员出售了更多的股票,而不是购买。可以在下面的图表中查看过去一年内的内部交易(由公司和个人)。如果单击图表,您可以看到所有的个人交易,包括股价、个人和日期!
![insider-trading-volume](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240701/0-2c7a58b3bc43f6d74ef3d6b9ff043608-0-4aed93c891e28da0b7d8f1a5c8ea8a69.png/big)
If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of small cap stocks that are not only being bought by insiders but also have attractive valuations.
如果您和我一样,您就不会错过这个免费的小盘股票列表,这些股票不仅被内部人士购买,而且估值也很有吸引力。
Insiders At Hamilton Insurance Group Have Sold Stock Recently
Hamilton Insurance Group的内部人员最近出售了股票
Over the last three months, we've seen a bit of insider selling at Hamilton Insurance Group. Group Chief Accounting Officer Brian Deegan sold US$367k worth of shares in that time. But US$352k was spent on buying, too, . While it's not great to see insider selling, the net amount sold isn't enough for us to want to read anything into it.
在过去的三个月中,我们看到Hamilton Insurance Group的内部人士在卖出股票。集团首席会计师Brian Deegan在此期间卖出了367,000美元的股票。但也有352,000美元的购买。虽然看到内部人员的卖出情况并不好,但被卖出的净金额不足以让我们读出什么信息。
Does Hamilton Insurance Group Boast High Insider Ownership?
Hamilton Insurance Group是否拥有高内部所有权?对于普通股东来说,检查公司内部人员持有多少股份是值得的。高的内部所有权通常使公司领导更加注重股东的利益。看起来Hamilton Insurance Group的内部人员拥有该公司的2.4%股权,价值约45m美元。这种内部所有权水平很好,但并非特别突出。当然,这确实表明了一定的业绩一致性。
For a common shareholder, it is worth checking how many shares are held by company insiders. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. It appears that Hamilton Insurance Group insiders own 2.4% of the company, worth about US$45m. This level of insider ownership is good but just short of being particularly stand-out. It certainly does suggest a reasonable degree of alignment.
那么Hamilton Insurance Group的内部交易是什么意思?在过去的三个月中,内部卖出的数量超过内部购买的数量。但是差异很小,因此不令人担忧。我们对Hamilton Insurance Group的内部卖出有点谨慎。略高的内部持股水平至少可以让我们感到一些安慰。除了了解正在进行的内部交易之外,确定Hamilton Insurance Group面临的风险也是有益的。例如- Hamilton Insurance Group有1个我们认为您应该知道的警告标志。
So What Do The Hamilton Insurance Group Insider Transactions Indicate?
所以,Hamilton Insurance Group的内部交易意味着什么?在过去的三个月中,内部人员的卖出量仅略多于购买量。但差异很小,因此不令人担忧。我们对Hamilton Insurance Group的内部卖出有点谨慎。略高的内部持股水平至少可以让我们感到一些安慰。除了了解正在进行的内部交易之外,确定Hamilton Insurance Group面临的风险也是有益的。例如- Hamilton Insurance Group有1个我们认为您应该知道的警告标志。
Insider selling has just outweighed insider buying in the last three months. But the difference is small, and thus, not concerning. We're a little cautious about the insider selling at Hamilton Insurance Group. The modest level of insider ownership is, at least, some comfort. In addition to knowing about insider transactions going on, it's beneficial to identify the risks facing Hamilton Insurance Group. For example - Hamilton Insurance Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
在过去的三个月中,内部人员的卖出量仅略多于购买量。但差异很小,因此不令人担忧。我们对Hamilton Insurance Group的内部卖出有点谨慎。略高的内部持股水平至少可以让我们感到一些安慰。除了了解正在进行的内部交易之外,确定Hamilton Insurance Group面临的风险也是有益的。例如- Hamilton Insurance Group有1个我们认为您应该知道的警告标志。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你想查看其他公司——那些具有开多净资产收益率和低负债的有趣公司的免费清单——那么不要错过这个机会。
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
对于本文而言,内部人是指向相关监管机构报告其交易的个人。我们目前仅考虑公开市场交易和直接利益的私人处置,但不包括衍生交易或间接利益。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。