share_log

Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600690) Last Week's 4.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600690) Last Week's 4.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

海尔智家股份有限公司(SHSE:600690)上周下跌了4.5%,一定会让拥有重大股份的个人投资者感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 03:53

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Haier Smart Home indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Institutions own 30% of Haier Smart Home
  • 海尔智家的大量个人投资表明,他们在管理和业务策略方面集体拥有更大的话语权。
  • 业务的51%由前15名股东持有。
  • 机构拥有海尔智家的30%。

If you want to know who really controls Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600690), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制海尔智家股份有限公司(SHSE:600690),那么你就需要看看其股权登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有该公司35%的所有权。换句话说,这个群体从他们对公司的投资中能获得最多的利益(或损失最多)。上周,个人投资者遭受了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了4.5%。在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注海尔智家的不同持股人群体。

And last week, individual investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.5%.

上周,随着股票下跌了4.5%,个人投资者遭受最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haier Smart Home.

下面的图表中,我们将重点关注海尔智家的不同持股人群体。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600690 Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
SHSE:600690所有权拆分于2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haier Smart Home?

机构所有权对海尔智家有何启示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Haier Smart Home already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Haier Smart Home's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

海尔智家的股权登记簿上已经有机构了,他们在公司中拥有尊重的股份。这表明专业投资者之间存在一定的可信度。但是,我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变其对一只股票的看法,你会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下海尔智家下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600690 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
2024年7月2日,SHSE:600690的收入和营业收入增长。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haier Smart Home. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Haier Group Corporation with 32% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.2% and 2.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对于海尔智家,对冲基金没有持有太多的股份。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是海尔集团公司,持有32%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大的股东分别持有该公司流通股的2.2%和2.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

所有者们拥有Compass Diversified 33%的股份,其中主要由个人投资者组成,对Compass Diversified产生了一定的影响。虽然该所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益之下影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Haier Smart Home

海尔智家的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own CN¥659m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有的海尔智家股份不到1%。但我们注意到,他们可能通过私人公司或其他公司结构间接拥有权益。由于公司规模如此之大,我们不希望内部人员拥有公司大量的股份。虽然至少有一些内部人员持股总是好的,但值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Haier Smart Home. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有海尔智家35%的股份。这种所有权的规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 33%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到私人公司拥有发行股份的33%。仅从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,因此值得考虑谁拥有那些私人公司的所有权。有时候内部人员或其他相关方会通过单独的私人公司拥有公共公司的股票权益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发