share_log

Zions Bancorporation National Association (NASDAQ:ZION) Shareholders Have Earned a 61% Return Over the Last Year

Zions Bancorporation National Association (NASDAQ:ZION) Shareholders Have Earned a 61% Return Over the Last Year

Zions Bancorporation National Association(纳斯达克:ZION)股东在过去一年中获得了61%的回报。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 07:49

If you want to compound wealth in the stock market, you can do so by buying an index fund. But one can do better than that by picking better than average stocks (as part of a diversified portfolio). For example, the Zions Bancorporation, National Association (NASDAQ:ZION) share price is up 54% in the last 1 year, clearly besting the market return of around 21% (not including dividends). That's a solid performance by our standards! In contrast, the longer term returns are negative, since the share price is 19% lower than it was three years ago.

如果你想通过股票市场来进行财富复利,你可以通过购买指数基金来做到。但是,通过选择优于平均水平的股票(作为分散化投资组合的一部分),你可以做得更好。例如,Zions Bancorporation,National Association(纳斯达克股票代码:ZION)的股价在过去1年中上涨了54%,显然优于市场回报率约21%(不包括红利)。根据我们的标准,这是一个不错的表现。相比之下,长期的回报率是负的,因为股价比三年前下跌了19%。

So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那么,让我们调查一下并查看公司的长期表现是否符合基本业务的进展。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯维尔超级投资者》中,沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式。考虑市场对公司的看法如何发生变化的一个不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的变动进行比较。股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式沃伦·巴菲特曾经描述过,股价并不总是理性地反映了企业的价值。评估市场对一家公司的情绪如何变化的一个有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

Over the last twelve months, Zions Bancorporation National Association actually shrank its EPS by 32%.

在过去的12个月里,Zions Bancorporation National Association的每股收益( EPS )实际上缩水了32%。

This means it's unlikely the market is judging the company based on earnings growth. Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

这意味着市场不太可能根据收益增长来判断该公司。由于每股收益的变化似乎与股价的变化无关,因此值得关注其他指标。

Unfortunately Zions Bancorporation National Association's fell 6.0% over twelve months. So the fundamental metrics don't provide an obvious explanation for the share price gain.

不幸的是,Zions Bancorporation National Association在12个月内下跌了6.0%。因此,基本指标没有提供股价上涨的明显解释。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下图显示了收益和营收随时间变化的情况(如果你点击图像,可以看到更多细节):

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:ZION Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
纳斯达克股票代码ZION的收益和营业收入增长2024年7月2日

We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Zions Bancorporation National Association

我们喜欢看到内部人士在过去的12个月中购买了股票。即便如此,未来的收益对于现有股东是否赚钱将更加重要。这份免费的报告显示了分析师预测,应该可以帮助您形成对Zions Bancorporation National Association的看法。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Zions Bancorporation National Association's TSR for the last 1 year was 61%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)和股票回报之间的差异。 TSR包括任何剥离或折让的资本筹集(基于股息被重新投资的假设),以及任何股息。因此,对于支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回报高得多。就中国神威药业集团而言,其TSR在过去5年中达到了75%。这超过了我们之前提到的股票回报。该公司支付的股息已经提高了总股东回报。总股东回报股票回报TSR是一个回报计算,考虑到现金红利(假设收到的任何红利都被再投资)的价值以及任何折价的股本增发和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于支付慷慨的红利的公司,TSR通常比股价回报率高得多。正如事实所证明的那样,Zions Bancorporation National Association过去1年的TSR为61%,高于前面提到的股价回报率。毫无疑问,红利支付在很大程度上解释了这种差异!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

It's nice to see that Zions Bancorporation National Association shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 61% over the last year. That's including the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 3%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. If you want to research this stock further, the data on insider buying is an obvious place to start. You can click here to see who has been buying shares - and the price they paid.

看到Zions Bancorporation National Association的股东在过去一年中获得了61%的总股东回报率是令人愉快的。这还包括红利。这种收益比过去五年的年度TSR(3%)要好。因此,最近公司周围的情感似乎是积极的。在最好的情况下,这可能暗示着一些真正的业务势头,这意味着现在可能是深入挖掘的好时机。如果你想进一步研究这只股票,内部买卖股票的数据是一个明显的起点。你可以点击这里查看谁买了股票和他们支付的价格。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar).

如果您喜欢与管理层共同购买股票,那么您可能会喜欢这个免费的公司列表(提示:大多数公司没有受到关注)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发