share_log

Insiders of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK) Must Be Frustrated After Market Cap Dropped US$56m Since Recent Purchases

Insiders of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK) Must Be Frustrated After Market Cap Dropped US$56m Since Recent Purchases

自OPKO Health,Inc.(NASDAQ:OPK)内部人士近期购买以来,市值下跌了5千6百万美元,他们一定很失望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 09:18

Key Insights

主要见解

  • OPKO Health's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • OPKO 健康的重要内部所有权表明对公司扩张的固有利益。
  • 前4大股东拥有公司的50%的股份。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要想了解谁真正掌控OPKO健康公司(纳斯达克:OPK),了解业务的所有权结构就很重要。 我们可以看到,个别内部人员拥有公司50%的所有权。 换句话说,这个团体最有可能从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或者失去最多)。

And looking at our data, we can see that insiders have bought shares recently. So the news of stock price falling by 6.1% is not something they might have been expecting soon after purchasing shares.

通过观察我们的数据,我们可以看到内幕人士最近购买了股票。 因此,股价下跌6.1%的新闻并不是他们购买股票后不久就可能预料到的事情。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about OPKO Health.

让我们更近距离地观察一下不同类型的股东可以为我们提供有关OPKO健康公司的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OPK Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
纳斯达克GS:OPK所有权状态分解截至2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OPKO Health?

机构投资者持有OPKO健康公司的证券数量告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in OPKO Health. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see OPKO Health's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在OPKO健康公司中持有很大的比例。这可以表明该公司在投资社区中拥有一定的信誉度。 但是,最好不要过多地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会犯错。 当多个机构持有某个股票时,存在这样一个风险,即它们可能处于“拥挤的交易”中。 当这样的交易失败时,多方可能会争相快速抛售股票。 在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。你可以看下面的OPKO健康公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事还有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OPK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
纳斯达克GS:OPK营收和收益增长状态从2024年7月2日开始

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in OPKO Health. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Phillip Frost with 35% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.8% and 4.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Gary Nabel is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我们注意到对OPKO健康公司没有重大投资的对冲基金。 从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是首席执行官菲利普·弗罗斯特,其持有的股份达35%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.8%和4.8%的股票。有趣的是,第二大股东Gary Nabel也是高级主管,再次表明该公司的顶级股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究也揭示了一个事实,即四大股东大约控制着公司的50%的股份,这表明这些所有者在业务中具有重要的影响力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of OPKO Health

OPKO健康公司的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of OPKO Health, Inc.. Insiders have a US$432m stake in this US$871m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

似乎内部人员拥有OPKO健康公司的相当大比例。内部人员在这家价值8.71亿美元的公司中持有4.32亿美元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。单击此处以查看他们是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OPKO Health. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有23%股权的散户(主要包括个人投资者)对OPKO健康公司具有一定影响力。 尽管该团体不一定能够决定大局,但当然确实对公司的经营产生了实质影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that OPKO Health is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我觉得了解公司的实际拥有者非常有趣。但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。 请注意,OPKO健康公司在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警告信号,您应该知道......

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发