share_log

Following Recent Decline, Shanghai Awinic Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688798) Top Shareholder CEO Hongjun Sun Sees Holdings Value Drop by 9.0%

Following Recent Decline, Shanghai Awinic Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688798) Top Shareholder CEO Hongjun Sun Sees Holdings Value Drop by 9.0%

在最近的下跌后,上海艾伟康科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688798)的首席股东孙洪军CEO的持股价值下降了9.0%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 20:20

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • 13% of Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
  • 上海艾维尼克科技有限公司大量的内部所有权表明公司扩张的固有利益
  • 共有2位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为52%
  • 上海艾维尼克科技有限公司13%的股份由机构持有

Every investor in Shanghai Awinic Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688798) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 61% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

上海艾维尼克科技有限公司的每位投资者, Ltd.(上海证券交易所代码:688798)应该知道最强大的股东群体。个人内部人士持有61%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to CN¥12b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着上周市值跌至120亿元人民币,内部人士面临的亏损将超过该公司任何其他股东群体。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd.

在下图中,我们放大了上海艾维尼克科技有限公司的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688798 Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
SHSE: 688798 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd?

关于上海艾维尼克科技有限公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,上海艾维尼克科技有限公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到上海艾维尼克科技有限公司的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688798 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
SHSE: 688798 2024 年 7 月 3 日收益和收入增长

Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hongjun Sun with 42% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.7% and 4.1% of the stock.

上海艾维尼克科技有限公司不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官孙红军,已发行股份的42%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.7%和4.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前两位股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd

上海艾维尼克科技有限公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Shanghai Awinic Technology Co.,Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥7.3b stake in this CN¥12b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

看来内部人士拥有上海艾维尼克科技有限公司一半以上的股份。,有限公司股票。这赋予了他们很大的力量。这意味着内部人士在这项120元人民币的业务中拥有非常有价值的73元人民币的股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否在出售他们的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Shanghai Awinic TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有上海艾维尼克科技有限公司21%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 4.1%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的4.1%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发