share_log

Does APA (NASDAQ:APA) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does APA (NASDAQ:APA) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

APA (纳斯达克:APA)的资产负债表状况良好吗?
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 06:18

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that APA Corporation (NASDAQ:APA) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

伯克希尔哈撒韦旗下的外部基金管理人Charlie Munger支持的李录在说“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是您是否会遭受永久性的资本损失。”时一点也不含糊。当您考虑一个公司有多大的风险时,自然会考虑它的资产负债表,因为在企业倒闭时通常会牵涉到债务。我们可以看到APA Corporation(纳斯达克:APA)确实在业务中使用了债务。但真正的问题是这些债务是否使公司变得有风险。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债权人,那么它存在于债权人的掌控之中。如果情况变得非常糟糕,债权人可以接管企业。但是,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是公司必须以惊人的低价发行股票,永久性地稀释股东的权益,以支持其资产负债表。当然,债务的好处在于它通常代表廉价的资本,尤其是当它代替具有高回报率的公司再投资时。当我们考虑公司的债务使用时,我们首先看现金和债务的总和。

How Much Debt Does APA Carry?

APA负担有多大的债务?

As you can see below, APA had US$5.15b of debt at March 2024, down from US$5.76b a year prior. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

正如下面所示,到2024年3月,APA的债务总额为51.5亿美元,较前一年的57.6亿美元有所下降。净债务基本相同,因为它没有太多现金。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:APA Debt to Equity History July 3rd 2024
纳斯达克GS:APA股权负债历史2024年7月3日

How Strong Is APA's Balance Sheet?

APA的资产负债表有多强?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that APA had liabilities of US$2.15b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$9.15b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$102.0m as well as receivables valued at US$1.60b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$9.60b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我们可以看到,根据最近的资产负债表,APA的短期到期负债为21.5亿美元,而长期到期负债为91.5亿美元。抵消这些负债的是,它有1.02亿美元的现金以及1.6亿美元的应收账款,在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比现金和短期应收账款还要高达96亿美元。

This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$11.0b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on APA's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相对于其110亿美元的极高市值,这个逆差还是相当大的,因此这表明股东们应该密切关注APA的债务使用情况。这表明,如果公司需要迅速扭转资产负债表,股东们将会被削弱。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了衡量公司债务相对于其收益的大小,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)以及其税前收益与利息支出(其利息覆盖率)的比率。这样,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量,也考虑了所支付的利率。

APA has net debt of just 1.0 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 10.0 times, which is more than adequate. But the bad news is that APA has seen its EBIT plunge 11% in the last twelve months. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine APA's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

APA的净债务只有1.0倍的EBITDA,表明它绝对不是一个鲁莽的借款人。而且它的利息覆盖率为10.0倍,完全足够。但不幸的是,APA在过去12个月中,其EBIT暴跌了11%。如果收益的下降速度继续下去,公司可能会陷入困境。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。不过,未来的盈利,更多的是决定APA的资产负债表能否保持健康的关键因素。因此,如果您想知道专业人士对此的看法,您可能会发现分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, APA produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 51% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最后,企业需要有自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能解决问题。因此,查看由多少EBIT支持的自由现金流是值得的。在过去的三年中,APA取得了相当可观的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的51%,这与我们的预期大致相同。这种自由现金流将使公司在适当时候有能力偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

While APA's EBIT growth rate does give us pause, its interest cover and net debt to EBITDA suggest it can stay on top of its debt load. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think APA's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for APA you should be aware of, and 2 of them can't be ignored.

虽然APA的EBIT增长率让我们有所顾虑,但其利息支付能力和净债务EBITDA比也表明它能够应对其债务负担。综合以上因素,我们认为APA的债务对业务造成一定的风险。因此,虽然杠杆作用确实可以提高股本回报率,但我们并不希望看到它从目前的水平上升。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到了大多数关于债务的信息。然而,并不是所有的投资风险都来自资产负债表-远非如此。例如:我们发现APA存在4个警告信号,您应该意识到其中有2个是无法忽视的。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发