Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 35% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 29%
Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 35% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 29%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Hongfa Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutions own 29% of Hongfa Technology
- 创业板宏发股份的散户控股意味着广大公众更有权力影响管理和治理相关决策。
- 前12名股东持有该公司51%的股份。
- 机构占有宏发股份29%的股权。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hongfa Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600885), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解宏发股份股权结构,了解真正掌控它的人,就需要认识业务的所有权结构。我们可以看到散户拥有公司35%的股权,因此,如果股票上涨,则该群体将获益最多(如果出现下降,则失去的也最多)。
And institutions on the other hand have a 29% ownership in the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.
机构占公司29%的股份。机构往往拥有更成熟的公司的股份,而在小公司中看到内部人员拥有相当多的股份并不罕见。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hongfa Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探究宏发股份的每一种业主类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hongfa Technology?
机构持股量说明宏发股份什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hongfa Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hongfa Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在宏发股份拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者们对该公司颇有信誉。但我们不能只依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一支股票,那么看到股价大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,值得检查宏发股份过去的盈利轨迹(如下图)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。
Hongfa Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Youge Investment Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 3.4% of the stock.
宏发股份不属于对冲基金所有。优格投资有限公司目前是该公司的最大股东,持有该公司27%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约5.4%和3.4%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
看一下股东注册表,我们可以看到前12大股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东掌握多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Hongfa Technology
宏发股份的内部人员拥有的股份。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起来,私营企业拥有安徽皖能电力股票的58%。这值得深入挖掘。如果相关方,如内部人士,在其中一家私营企业中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 35% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投资者在内的普通公众拥有该公司35%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然所有权很大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据表明,私营公司持有公司27%的股份。仅凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得关注谁拥有这些私营公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司拥有公共公司的股权。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Hongfa Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
虽然考虑到公司的不同掌控群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,艾卫公司的投资分析中显示一个警示标志,您需要了解这一点...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。