share_log

Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363) Stock Performs Better Than Its Underlying Earnings Growth Over Last Five Years

Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363) Stock Performs Better Than Its Underlying Earnings Growth Over Last Five Years

上海兴业证券(HKG:363)股票在过去五年中表现优于其基础盈利增长
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 18:01

While not a mind-blowing move, it is good to see that the Shanghai Industrial Holdings Limited (HKG:363) share price has gained 12% in the last three months. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last five years have been less than pleasing. You would have done a lot better buying an index fund, since the stock has dropped 28% in that half decade.

在过去的三个月中,上海兴业证券(股票代码:363)的股价上涨了12%,虽然这并不是一个惊人的变化,但还是让人感到欣慰。可是,过去五年的回报率并不理想。由于该股在过去的五年中下跌了28%,如果你购买了指数基金,则收益会更好。

While the last five years has been tough for Shanghai Industrial Holdings shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.

尽管上海兴业证券的股东在过去的五年中曾经历艰难时期,但过去一周却显示出了迹象。因此,让我们来看看长期的基本面情况,看看它们是否是负回报的驱动因素。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否认的是,市场有时是高效的,但价格并不总是反映潜在的商业表现。一个不完美但简单的方法来考虑公司市场感知如何改变是比较每股收益(EPS)变化和股价变动。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Shanghai Industrial Holdings actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.5% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在这个不幸的半个十年期间,上海兴业证券的股价下跌,但其每股收益实际上每年提高了0.5%。因此,EPS似乎并不是了解市场如何评估股票的良好指南。或者,过去的增长预期可能是不合理的。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Having said that, we might get a better idea of what's going on with the stock by looking at other metrics.

我们喜欢内部人员在过去的12个月中购买股票。 话虽如此,大多数人认为,收益和收入增长趋势是业务更有意义的指标。 如果您正在考虑购买或出售CVB金融股票,请查看此免费报告,其中显示了分析师的利润预测。

The most recent dividend was actually lower than it was in the past, so that may have sent the share price lower.

最近的分红实际上比过去低,可能导致股价下跌。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的图片中看到收入和营业收入随时间的变化情况(单击图表可查看精确值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:363 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
SEHK:3632014年7月4日收益和营收增长

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Shanghai Industrial Holdings will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

值得注意的是,与同样规模的公司相比,上海兴业证券的CEO报酬低于中位数。关注CEO的薪酬水平总是有价值的,但更重要的问题是公司是否能在未来增加收入。因此,检查分析师对上海兴业证券未来收益的预测(免费利润预测)是非常合理的。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Shanghai Industrial Holdings the TSR over the last 5 years was 12%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)和股票回报之间的差异。 TSR包括任何剥离或折让的资本筹集(基于股息被重新投资的假设),以及任何股息。因此,对于支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回报高得多。就中国神威药业集团而言,其TSR在过去5年中达到了75%。这超过了我们之前提到的股票回报。该公司支付的股息已经提高了总股东回报。总股东回报股票回报与股价回报只反映股价变化不同,TSR包括股息的价值(假设它们被重新投资)以及任何折扣的增资或剥离的利益。可以说,TSR给出了一张更全面的股票回报图片。我们注意到,上海兴业证券的TSR在过去5年中为12%,比上述股价回报要好。公司支付的股息因此提高了...股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

It's nice to see that Shanghai Industrial Holdings shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 18% over the last year. That's including the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 2% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Shanghai Industrial Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Shanghai Industrial Holdings (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

很高兴看到上海兴业证券的股东在过去一年中获得了18%的总股东回报,包括股息。由于一年的TSR比五年的TSR(后者为每年2%)要好,因此似乎该股票的业绩在近期得到了改善。在最好的情况下,这可能暗示着一些真正的业务动力,这暗示着现在深入挖掘的好时机。长期跟踪股价表现总是很有趣的,但为了更好地理解上海兴业证券,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经发现了两个警示信号,其中一个可能令人担忧,你应该知道。

Of course Shanghai Industrial Holdings may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

当然,上海兴业证券可能不是最好的股票买入选择。因此,你可能希望看到这些增长型股票的自由集合。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了当前在香港证券交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发