share_log

We Think DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

We Think DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

我们认为Dt Midstream(纽交所:DTM)在其债务方面存在一些风险。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 08:13

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE:DTM) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

David Iben曾明确表示,“波动性不是我们关心的风险,我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失”。因此,当您考虑任何给定股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会导致公司破产。我们可以看到,DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)在其业务中使用了债务。但更重要的问题是:这些债务造成了多少风险?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

负债在企业遇到麻烦、无法用新的资本或自由现金流偿还时会给企业提供帮助。如果公司无法履行偿还负债的法律义务,股东可能会一无所有。然而,更常见的(但仍很痛苦)情况是,公司不得不以低价筹集新的股权资本,从而永久稀释股东的利益。当然,许多公司在没有负面后果的情况下使用负债来进行增长。在考虑一家公司的负债水平时的第一步是考虑其现金和债务的总体情况。

How Much Debt Does DT Midstream Carry?

DT Midstream的负债有多重?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that DT Midstream had US$3.12b of debt in March 2024, down from US$3.47b, one year before. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,其显示DT Midstream于2024年3月有31.2亿美元的债务,下降至3.47亿美元,比起一年前略有下降。净债务大致相同,因为其没有太多的现金。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:DTM Debt to Equity History July 5th 2024
NYSE:DTM负债股本比历史记录于2024年7月5日

A Look At DT Midstream's Liabilities

关于DT Midstream的负债

The latest balance sheet data shows that DT Midstream had liabilities of US$322.0m due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.32b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$41.0m in cash and US$150.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.45b.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,DT Midstream有3.22亿美元的负债在一年内到期,之后到期的负债有43.2亿美元。相对之下,12个月内到期的现金和应收账款分别有4100万美元和1500万美元。因此,其负债超过了其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和,超过了445亿美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$6.82b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相对于其市值68.2亿美元而言,这是一座巨大的杠杆。这表明,如果公司需要迅速补充其资产负债表,股东们将遭受严重稀释。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通过查看公司的净债务与利息、税、折旧、摊销前利润(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息费用(利息覆盖率)可以衡量一个公司的债务负担与收益能力。因此,我们考虑将债务与有无计算折旧和摊销费用的收益相对比。

DT Midstream has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.2 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. The good news is that DT Midstream improved its EBIT by 4.3% over the last twelve months, thus gradually reducing its debt levels relative to its earnings. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if DT Midstream can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

DT Midstream的债务/EBITDA比率为4.6,其EBIT覆盖利息支出的次数为3.2次。总的来说,这表明尽管我们不希望看到债务水平上升,但我们认为该公司可以处理其当前的杠杆。好消息是,DT Midstream在过去十二个月中提高了其EBIT 4.3%,逐步将其债务水平与其收入相对比降低。分析债务水平时,资产负债表是开始研究的明显位置。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定DT Midstream是否能够随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的意见,则可能会发现此免费报告——分析师盈利预测——很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, DT Midstream recorded free cash flow worth 61% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,虽然税务人员可能会喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冰冷的现金。因此,我们始终检查有多少EBIT转化为自由现金流。在最近的三年中,DT Midstream录得的自由现金流价值为其EBIT的61%,这个值在免除利息和税金的情况下是正常的。这笔冰冷的现金意味着在需要的时候可以减轻债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Both DT Midstream's net debt to EBITDA and its interest cover were discouraging. But its not so bad at converting EBIT to free cash flow. We think that DT Midstream's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with DT Midstream .

DT Midstream的净债务/EBITDA和利息保障倍数让人望而却步。但是将其EBIT换算为自由现金流的能力并不差。考虑到上述数据点后,我们认为DT Midstream的债务确实使其有些风险。这并不一定是件坏事,因为杠杆可以提高股本收益,但这是需要注意的事情。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解债务的信息最丰富。但最终,每家公司都可能有存在于资产负债表以外的风险。因此,您应该注意我们在DT Midstream中发现的2个警告信号。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时更容易关注那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费查看零净债务增长股票列表,立即获得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发