share_log

With 81% Ownership, The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 81% Ownership, The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有81%股权的J. m. Smucker公司(纽交所:SJM)拥有强大的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 08:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies J. M. Smucker's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构股东的持股比例极高,这意味着J. m. Smucker的股票价格对机构股东的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 总共有19个投资者持有该公司大多数股份,占有51%的股权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

Every investor in The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

所有J. m. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM)的投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有最大一部分股份的群体是机构,持股比例为81%。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者如果有下跌,损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of J. M. Smucker, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地研究J. m. Smucker的每种所有者类型,从下图开始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SJM Ownership Breakdown July 5th 2024
NYSE:SJm所有权分布2024年7月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About J. M. Smucker?

机构持有权告诉我们什么关于J. m. Smucker?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that J. M. Smucker does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of J. M. Smucker, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到J. m. Smucker确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的大量股票。这表明专业投资者们持续信任该公司。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错误,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,股价暴跌也是很常见的。因此,值得检查一下J. m. Smucker过去的盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,还要记住也有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SJM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
NYSE:SJm收益和营业收入增长2024年7月5日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. J. M. Smucker is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上持有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重大的影响力。J. m. Smucker不是由对冲基金持有的。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份。为了更好的了解情况,第二大股东持有约8.6%的流通股份,第三大股东持有6.2%的所有权。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

观察股东登记表,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前19位股东控制,这意味着没有单一的股东掌握了多数股权所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of J. M. Smucker

J. m. Smucker的内部持股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in The J. M. Smucker Company. Insiders own US$405m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到J. m. Smucker Company的内部人员持有股份。内部人员拥有4,0500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会认为这表明股东和董事会之间有良好的利益一致性。但是,还值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在抛售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in J. M. Smucker. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众持有J. m. Smucker 15%的股份,虽然这种股权的大小可能不足以影响公司的政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand J. M. Smucker better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for J. M. Smucker you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

思考拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解J. m. Smucker,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。事实证明:我们已经看到了J. m. Smucker的3个警示,您应该了解其中1个有点令人担忧。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发