Shareholders in National Vision Holdings (NASDAQ:EYE) Have Lost 76%, as Stock Drops 6.3% This Past Week
Shareholders in National Vision Holdings (NASDAQ:EYE) Have Lost 76%, as Stock Drops 6.3% This Past Week
Every investor on earth makes bad calls sometimes. But you have a problem if you face massive losses more than once in a while. So spare a thought for the long term shareholders of National Vision Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:EYE); the share price is down a whopping 76% in the last three years. That would be a disturbing experience. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 51% in a year. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 40% in the last 90 days.
地球上的每个投资者都会犯错。但是,如果你经常面对巨大的损失,那么你就有问题了。那么,请为National Vision Holdings,Inc. (纳斯达克:EYE)的长期股东考虑一下;股票价格在过去三年中暴跌了76%。这将是一个令人不安的经历。最近的消息也没有什么安慰,股价在一年内下跌了51%。股东们最近的境遇更加艰难,股价在过去90天中下跌了40%。
If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for National Vision Holdings isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.
如果过去一周是任何参考,那么National Vision Holdings的投资者情绪并不乐观,因此让我们看看基本面和股票价格之间是否存在不匹配。
While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
虽然有效市场假说仍然被一些人教授,但被证明市场是过度反应的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。检查市场情绪如何随时间变化的一种方法是看一个公司的股价与其每股收益(EPS)之间的交互作用。
National Vision Holdings saw its share price decline over the three years in which its EPS also dropped, falling to a loss. Extraordinary items contributed to this situation. Due to the loss, it's not easy to use EPS as a reliable guide to the business. But it's safe to say we'd generally expect the share price to be lower as a result!
在National Vision Holdings的EPS下降,陷入亏损的三年里,其股价也下跌了。特殊项目导致了这种情况。由于亏损,很难将EPS作为业务的可靠指南。但可以说,我们通常希望股票价格会因此而降低!
You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).
您可以在下面的图片中查看每股收益如何随时间变化(单击图表以查看确切的价值)。
It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..
很高兴看到在过去三个月中有一些重要的内部买入,这是积极的。话虽如此,我们认为考虑收益和营收增长趋势更为重要。在买卖股票之前,我们始终建议对历史增长趋势进行仔细的考虑。这里可以提供相关数据。
A Different Perspective
不同的观点
Investors in National Vision Holdings had a tough year, with a total loss of 51%, against a market gain of about 26%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 10% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. If you want to research this stock further, the data on insider buying is an obvious place to start. You can click here to see who has been buying shares - and the price they paid.
National Vision Holdings的投资者度过了艰难的一年,全年亏损51%,而市场增长约为26%。即使好股票的股价有时会下跌,但我们希望在对一个企业的基本指标有所改善之前,才会对其产生浓厚兴趣。不幸的是,去年的表现可能表明存在尚未解决的挑战,因为比过去半个世纪的年化亏损10%还要糟糕。一般来说,长期股价疲软可能是一个不好的迹象,尽管违背常规的投资者可能会在希望企业扭转局面时对股票进行研究。如果您想更深入地研究此股票,内部买入数据是一个显而易见的起点。您可以单击此处查看谁购买了股票以及他们支付的价格。
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar).
如果您喜欢与管理层共同购买股票,那么您可能会喜欢这个免费的公司列表(提示:大多数公司没有受到关注)。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com