share_log

Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) Shareholders Have Endured a 8.4% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) Shareholders Have Endured a 8.4% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

自三年前购买该股票以来,Kraft Heinz(纳斯达克:KHC)的股东们已经遭受了8.4%的损失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/06 10:47

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) shareholders, since the share price is down 20% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 20%. Furthermore, it's down 13% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders.

许多投资者定义成功的投资为长期击败市场平均水平。但几乎可以确定,有时您会购买表现低于市场平均回报的股票。不幸的是,长期持有巨型食品生产商The Kraft Heinz Company (纳斯达克股票代码:KHC)的股票价格在过去三年中下跌了20%,远远低于市场回报约20%。此外,它在大约一个季度的时间里下跌了13%。对于持有者而言,这并不好玩。

So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那么我们来看看这家公司的长期表现是否符合其业务进展情况。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

虽然一些人仍然在教授高效市场假说,但已经证明市场是过度反应的动态系统,投资者不总是理性的。一种有缺陷但合理的评估公司情绪变化的方法是比较每股收益 (EPS) 与股价。

Although the share price is down over three years, Kraft Heinz actually managed to grow EPS by 74% per year in that time. This is quite a puzzle, and suggests there might be something temporarily buoying the share price. Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

尽管过去三年股价下跌,卡夫亨氏在该时间内实际上实现了每股收益每年74%的增长。这是一个相当棘手的问题,并暗示着股价可能存在暂时性的支撑因素。否则,在历史上公司被过度虚高,因此其增长没有如预期那样。

Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

由于EPS的变化似乎与股价的变化不相关,因此值得查看其他指标。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. Kraft Heinz has maintained its top line over three years, so we doubt that has shareholders worried. So it might be worth looking at how revenue growth over time, in greater detail.

我们注意到分红派息似乎足够健康,所以这可能并不能解释股价下跌。卡夫亨氏在过去的三年中保持了其营业收入,因此我们怀疑股东担心此事。因此,可能值得更详细地查看营收增长的历史变化。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的图表显示了收益和营收随时间的变化情况(通过单击图像揭示确切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:KHC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 6th 2024
纳斯达克:卡夫亨氏每股收益和营业收入创业板2024年7月6日

Kraft Heinz is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. Given we have quite a good number of analyst forecasts, it might be well worth checking out this free chart depicting consensus estimates.

卡夫亨氏是一只广受关注的股票,有很多分析师进行覆盖,这表明有一定的未来增长可见性。由于我们拥有相当多的分析师预测数据,因此很值得查看此图表中的预计共识估计。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Kraft Heinz, it has a TSR of -8.4% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)和股票回报之间的差异。 TSR包括任何剥离或折让的资本筹集(基于股息被重新投资的假设),以及任何股息。因此,对于支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回报高得多。就中国神威药业集团而言,其TSR在过去5年中达到了75%。这超过了我们之前提到的股票回报。该公司支付的股息已经提高了总股东回报。总股东回报股票回报尽管股价回报仅反映了股价变化,TSR包括了股息的价值(假设它们已被再次投资)以及任何折扣融资或剥离带来的好处。毫无疑问,对于支付股息的股票而言,TSR给出了更完整的图像。就卡夫亨氏而言,它在过去的三年中TSR为-8.4%,超过了我们先前提到的股价回报。公司支付的股息因此提高了其TSR。股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

Kraft Heinz shareholders are down 5.2% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 26%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 6% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Kraft Heinz better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Kraft Heinz .

卡夫亨氏的股东今年下跌了5.2%(包括股息),但市场本身上涨了26%。即使是优秀的股票的股价有时也会下跌,但在我们产生兴趣之前,我们希望看到业务的基本指标有所改善。好消息是,长期持股人获得了收益,每年平均增长了6%以上。如果基本数据继续表明长期可持续增长,那么目前的抛售可能是一个值得考虑的机会。跟踪股价表现长期而言总是有趣的,但要更好地了解卡夫亨氏,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们在与卡夫亨氏相关的两个警示标志。

But note: Kraft Heinz may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但请注意:卡夫亨氏可能不是最佳的买入股票。因此,可以查看过去收益增长(以及更多增长预测)的有趣公司的免费列表。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发