share_log

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (NYSE:PEG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (NYSE:PEG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

机构持有者持有公司75%的股份,有利于公务集团股份有限公司(纽交所:PEG)
Simply Wall St ·  07/07 10:00

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Public Service Enterprise Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构在公务集团持有大量股份意味着他们对公司的股价有重要影响力。
  • 业务的50%由前21名股东持有。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

If you want to know who really controls Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (NYSE:PEG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正掌控Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (NYSE:PEG),则必须看看它的股权登记簿的结构。尤其是,在公司中持有大量股份的集团(精确地说是大约75%的股份)是机构。换言之,这个集团从他们对公司的投资中可以获得最多的收益(或者损失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Public Service Enterprise Group.

下面的图表展示了Public Service Enterprise Group不同的所有权集团。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:PEG Ownership Breakdown July 7th 2024
NYSE:PEG所有权结构于2024年7月7日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Public Service Enterprise Group?

机构持股情况对Public Service Enterprise Group有什么影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Public Service Enterprise Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Public Service Enterprise Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Public Service Enterprise Group已经拥有机构的持股。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当大的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的声望。然而,最好还是要谨慎地依赖于来自机构投资者的所谓认可。他们也有时会犯错。如果两个大的机构投资者尝试同时抛售股票,经常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,可以查看Public Service Enterprise Group的过去收益轨迹(如下面所示)。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:PEG Earnings and Revenue Growth July 7th 2024
NYSE:PEG收益和营业收入增长于2024年7月7日。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Public Service Enterprise Group is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股份,董事会很可能需要关注他们的喜好。Public Service Enterprise Group未被对冲基金所拥有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份,而第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的11%和5.6%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

抚顺特钢股份有限公司内部所有权49.99%由前21名股东控制。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Public Service Enterprise Group

Public Service Enterprise Group内部所有权。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$54m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated的股份不到1%。由于这是一家大公司,我们只希望内部人员拥有其股份的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值5400万美元的股份。看到至少有一些内部人员拥有股份总是好的,但值得注意的是,他们是否一直在抛售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Public Service Enterprise Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众(通常是个人投资者)持有Public Service Enterprise Group的25%股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在决策中左右政策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Public Service Enterprise Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

虽然考虑公司所有的不同集团是值得的,但更重要的是还有其他因素。请注意,Public Service Enterprise Group在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警告信号,其中1个让我们感到有点不安……

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发